My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19840103
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
County Clerk
>
AGENDAS
>
1984
>
AG19840103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:13:49 AM
Creation date
2/7/2003 11:29:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
1/3/1984
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA <br /> DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <br /> <br />JAMESB. HUNT. JR. P.O. Box 640 <br />GOVERt~OR <br /> Albemarle, N. C. 2~;002-0640 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS <br />WILLIAM R. ROI~ERSON.JR. December ] .5, 1993 <br />SECRETARY <br /> <br /> Mr. 3. Harold Nash, Chairman <br /> Cabarrus County 5oard o~ ConTnissioners <br /> P. O. Box 707 <br /> Concord~ North Carolina 2g025 <br /> <br /> Re: Cessna Road (SR 14q3) Cabarrus County <br /> <br /> Dear Mr. Nosh: <br /> <br /> You will recall the discussion o[ the subject road during <br /> the County Corrrnissioners' meeting last Aprils when we brought <br /> to you a proposed secondary road construction programs as well <br /> as the matter being discussed at the Cabarrus County Board <br /> Commissioners' meeting on October 13s 1993. <br /> <br /> We have been diligently working towards a solution for <br /> getting this .25 mile of road paved. You are aware that this <br /> total road was in the priority paving program for 1975; however, <br /> the right of way could not be obtained for the south .25 ot a <br /> mile. We attempted to re-rate this road by using all the homes <br /> which fronted SR 1443 as a basis for changing the priority to <br /> Number 3-A. However, in discussing the matter with Secondary <br /> Roads Officer 3ack Murdock, he is of the opinion~ and we agree, <br /> that we should nor attempt to re-rate this road by using all <br /> the houses on the road, We do see the rationale and the need <br /> for completing the pavement on this road. <br /> <br /> We:~;Wbdl~,~ldket~fo~y.ou~to=.cqn~.i~et:an-op.e'n~mde-t'i'fig With a-~ <br /> speciJic agenda ~item Jor di.scussin§ the meri-ts' of completing <br /> '~'~ ~aving ~f.thi's load and. if the. County Corrmissioners so <br /> '~?~, 'we Would ~equest t~a~ yOU furnish us ~ith a resolutFon <br /> speciJically stating that you would like [or us to complete <br /> p~ying oJ thi.s road. I believe that the Board of Tfansportation <br /> would look [avorable upon that request. ] would point out that <br /> we will need to consider this road as having a paving priority <br /> o~ Number ll~ and not <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.