AG 1993 03 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' "~B-i6-"93 TUE 20:33 II):C D ~ M RALEIGH N C FFiX H0:919-781-5730 ~720 P~3 ~ Dr. Wi~Ii~ R Pinqngton February 16, 1993 Page 3 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE regulat{or~ am presently in draft form and subject to change, Bu..md upon everything I haw read. and people I have talked to about t~_ regulations. ttmro is no guarantee that Cabarras Cmmty will avoid any co,ts required to comply with tl~ CI~,~ Air Act became the l,mdKll wa~ op~ after lgovmnb~r 8, 1987. $orae lmblicatimm im/!m~ th~ Sta~es will hav~ mor~ flexibfli.'ty with e~isfing landfills ~ha~ they will with n~w oa~. The cost f~u~s presented by BFI axe reasonable, I lust do not think your chances of' /ncurring thmn am p~edicated upon whether or net you continu~ to operat.. I wo~ld not count on a~y ~av/ngs here. (c) Ope2ation and Maintenance frg Oas S~tem - see (b) above. I would not · count on any savings here. (d) Sm'face Maintenance - I a~mme this xeroxs to mainmmmce of ~e final cover and sedimentation basins, etc.., after .closure. My note~ ,qhow that Altar thougla yo~/r~pht actually save only 50 percent of BFI's e~rtim~ $750,000. Ithink you am going to have to rr~intain th~ site xegaxdless of wlma you clo~e. If you close later, you ~1I have mare d/sturbed area to maintain, bat the coat should not be proportionately kigh~r, ia my opiniom I would not count on saving say,ting here. (0 Surface Wats Monitoring - My notes show lt~ item ,crutched ont. I think we ~ ~t y~ may p~ mg~s of when you dose. ~ Su~ D ~htions ~d ~us it ~1 ~ ~v~ by S~e ~ I ~d~ tho S~e'~, ~m · ey ~ p~b~ly ~u~ ~e ~cy ~ ~ ~a~ w~r m~g. ~, I do not ~ y~ w~ ~w m do 30 ~ of s~ wa~ ~i~ ~ ~: ~ ~ not a ~st Ax I recall, ~ rl~ sot feel it was r~ces~ary for mc to corm'm~t on th~ llst of Ecnc~its to Cabarm~ .Cotmty and therefore I did not.