Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION D. <br /> 1. <br /> <br /> PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF CONCERN <br />Local Financial Security <br /> <br />Manager Recommendation: Support <br /> <br />NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF <br />COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br /> <br />MEMO RA.N33USI <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />SUB.rECT: <br /> <br />County Managers <br /> <br />Jim Blackburn, General Counsel <br /> <br />December 23, 1992 <br /> <br />"Local Financial Security" Legislation <br /> <br />~- C E ~--V ED <br /> <br />The State-Local Relations Subcomardnee of the Fiscal Trends and Reform Corn.mission has <br />recommended to the full Comm]ss]on ]e=*islation to deal with an issue of major importance <br />local gevenzments in North C~rol~a. The full Commission is scheduled to consider the <br />recommendations next week. <br /> <br />The legislation is tentatively entitled "An Act to give Local Government Units More Financial <br />Security rind Restore Growth to State-Col]octet Local Revenues and Tax-Sharing Funds." It is <br />designed to accomplish two purposes. FLrst, it would complete the effort begun in 1992 to <br />provide for automatic distribution of state payments to local governments in two general areas' <br />(1) reimbursements to local govern_ments for revenues lost because of General Assembly a~ <br />that reduced local tax revenues (repeal of inventory and some intangibles taxes, exemption ox <br />food stamp purchases from sales tax and the Homestead Exemption, and (2) taxes that are local <br />revenue sources but we collected by the state a;3d dls~buted to local governments (remaining <br />intangibles taxes, beer and wine taxes ~.nd utility francbJse taxes). The security of all of these <br />local revenue sources has been ha jeopardy since the ratification of Chapter 813 of the 1989 <br />Session Laws (House Bill 2377) in 3'une of 1990. The 1990 ]eglslation made all of these funds <br />subject to the -~-ppropriafions process ~nd was part of the legislative effort to dom with the budget <br />crisis hcing the state at that time. Legislation enacted in 1992, Chapter 993 of the 1991 Session <br />Laws (House Bill 916) provided for automatic dish'/but]on (rather than appropriation) of the first <br />of these two fund sources, the "reimbursements". <br /> <br />The second purpose to be accomplished by the proposed legislation deals with another problem <br />that resulted from the Legislature's budget-balancing effort, the 1991 freeze on the amounts of <br />all these revenues that were distributed by the state. Tiffs freeze c~used local governments to lose <br />the growth in those fund sources that grew namral]y or were indexed to provide for automatic <br />growth. T'.e proposed legtshtion would restore tkis growth to the state-collected, local revenue <br />fund source with the result that local goverm'nents would lose only the growth from the current <br />biennium that w~.s withheld tn order to balance the State's budget. <br /> <br /> <br />