My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2007 01 22 Regular
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
County Clerk
>
MEETING MINUTES
>
Board of Commissioners
>
2007
>
BC 2007 01 22 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2009 1:05:11 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 3:20:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
1/22/2007
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 22, 2007 (Regular Meeting) Page 294 <br />Chairman Carruth commented briefly on the development of a policy to <br />allow the Planning and Zoning Commission authority to grant refunds. This <br />policy. would onlyapply to mass rezonings for down zoning and have a <br />specified time limit. <br />Vice Chairmar. Juba suggested the request be returned to the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission for a recommendation. <br />Commissioner Privetteasked what would happen to the Smith's request. <br />Chairman Carruth asked Board members for their opinion. <br />Commissioner Juba expressed opposition to refunding the rezoning fee <br />and suggested again that the request be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission for consideration. <br />Commissioner Privette reported the Planning and Zoning Board approved <br />Mr. Smith's appeal and the Board of Commissioners approved a refund for <br />another property owner with similar circumstances. <br />Chairman Carruth explained the difference in the two situations <br />presented by Commissioner Privette. <br />Richard M. Koch, County Attorney, reported there was some informal <br />discussion by the Planning and Zoning Commission about the refund request, <br />but were of the opinion that it was not within their jurisdiction to make <br />such a determination. Because the County has special legislation, he further <br />reported it would be appropriate to create an ordinance delegating the <br />authority to the Planning and Zoning Commission to handle such requests. <br />There was a brief discussion and Mr. Marshall responded to additional <br />questions concerning the basis of the rezoning fee, other requests to rezone <br />property that was zoned OI (Office Institutional) by the County, etc. <br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Juba, seconded by Commissioner Mynatt with <br />Chairman Carruth, Vice Chairman Juba and Commissioners Mynatt and Privette <br />voting for and Commissioner White voting against, the Board voted to ask the <br />Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning Commission to make recommendations <br />concerning requests for refunds of rezoning fees and rezoning notification <br />procedures for the Board's consideration. <br />(G-4) Resolution Declaring Engliah as the Official Language in Cabarrus <br />County <br />Chairman Carruth reported last month, Commissioner Privette presented a <br />resolution to declare English as the official language in Cabarrus County and <br />the County Manager was asked to provide information regarding the effect on <br />county government. <br />John Day, County Manager, commented on the ambiguousness of the <br />resolution and reported..the County Attorney was asked to review the document. <br />Richard M. FCeoh,County Attorney, agreed with the County Manager and <br />stated the proposed resolution does not mandate English as the sole language <br />for official use in Cabarrus County. He also reported the resolution was <br />reviewed by three professors at the School of Government and they provided <br />similar responses. Healso referenced General Statute 195-12 which states, <br />"English is designated as the official language of the State of North <br />Carolina." <br />Mr. Day also reported he interpreted the resolution in its strictest <br />sense, there would be some federal or state laws or regulations that would be <br />violated and cited several examples from county departments. He further <br />reported Department Directors were asked to describe how the proposed <br />resolution would impact: the provision of county services and those responses <br />were provided in the Agenda. <br />Commissioner Privette commented on the adoption of English as the <br />official language in otherstates, reported there are 300 other counties that <br />have adopted the proposed resolution and commented on President Clinton's <br />Executive Order No. 1366. He also identified several reasons for adopting <br />theproposed resolution, <br />A revised resolution was distributed to the Board. <br />Commissioner Privette moved to adopt the revised resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.