Laserfiche WebLink
Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance <br />Chapter 4-Overlay Districts and Zones <br />1. A site plan, drawn to a scale of at least one (1) inch to forty (40) feet, indicating the <br />property lines of the parcel upon which the use is proposed; any existing or proposed <br />structures; parking areas and other built -upon areas; surface water drainage. The site <br />plan shall be neatly drawn and indicate north point, name and address of person who <br />prepared the plan, date of the original drawing, and an accurate record of any later <br />revisions. <br />2. A complete and detailed description of the proposed variance, together with any other <br />pertinent information which the applicant feels would be helpful to the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission, acting as Board of Adjustment, in considering application. <br />3. The Zoning Administrator shall notify in writing each local gover nt having <br />jurisdiction in the watershed and the entity using the water supp or consumption. <br />Such notice shall include a description of the variance be' s Local <br />governments receiving notice of the variance request m ubmit 5 e <br />Zoning Administrator prior to a decision by the Plea oning mis n, acting <br />as Board of Adjustment. Such comments shall b e <br />proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission, <br />Before the Planning and Zoning Commissio actin Board <br />variance, it shall make the following t fi ings, wh shi <br />permanent record of the case, an Cl u a fact ri <br />based: <br />a. There are oracticallIFflliulties or u <br />art he Jed of <br />;: 4c djustment. <br />ment, may grant a <br />ill rded in the <br />Masons on which they are <br />ry hardships in the way of carrying out <br />nce. In order — to determine that there are practical <br />hips, the Board must find that the five following <br />the provisions of the Ordinance, the applicant can <br />le return from, nor make reasonable use of, his <br />rope Me proving that the variance would permit a greater profit to <br />Tdco <br />m the property will not be considered adequate to justify the <br />and ranting a variance. Moreover, the Board shall consider whether <br />th riance is the minimum possible deviation from the terms of the <br />Vrdinance that will make possible the reasonable use of his property. <br />The hardship results from the application of the Ordinance to the property <br />rather than from other factors such as deed restrictions or other hardship. <br />iii. The hardship is due to the physical nature of the applicant's property, such <br />as its size, shape, or topography, which is different from that of neighboring <br />property. <br />iv. The hardship is not the result of the actions of an applicant who knowingly <br />or unknowingly violates the Ordinance, or who purchases the property after <br />the effective date of the Ordinance, and then comes to the Board for relief. <br />Chapter 4 Page 5 of 29 <br />G - 4 <br />Amended 8/1_ �Mnent number 1 \n <br />Page 407 <br />