My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2016 12 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2016
>
AG 2016 12 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2017 10:29:55 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 10:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/19/2016
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
computation further assumes that any new household would contribute the average amount of <br /> non-property tax revenues generated by existing residential properties, and takes as a benchmark <br /> the current property tax rate of 88¢ per $100. Based on these assumptions, the breakeven <br /> property value is computed to be just under $190,000. <br /> Discussion <br /> The results presented above provide answers to the two questions posed at the beginning <br /> of this report. As regards the public services provided by Gaston County, commercial and <br /> industrial land uses emerge as being the largest net contributor to local financial resources. In <br /> contrast, the value of public services provided to residential land uses exceed the property taxes <br /> and other revenues that they contribute to the county budget. This finding contrasts with claims <br /> that are sometimes made that residential development is a boon to county finances due to its <br /> expansion of the property tax base. It would appear that the very large footprint of the <br /> education and human services expenditures in the overall county budget plays a dominant role in <br /> explaining this phenomenon. Finally, agricultural lands more than pay their own way. This is <br /> true despite these properties being taxed on the basis of their current use (as opposed to their <br /> potential use were they to be transformed into commercial or residential uses). <br /> Qualitatively, these findings for Gaston County are consistent with the findings of nearly <br /> every Cost of Community Services study that has been carried out in other communities <br /> throughout the U.S. The degree of cross-subsidization of the residential sector—in particular, <br /> the extent to which the Gaston County's commercial sector pays for services provided to its <br /> residential sector—is somewhat lower than the median in other studies that have been conducted <br /> nationally. Closer to home, the relative balance of revenues and expenditures for the residential <br /> and commercial land use categories is qualitatively similar to that which was found in <br /> comparable studies conducted in Chatham, Wake, Alamance, Henderson, and Orange Counties. <br /> As was stressed at the outset, some degree of subsidization of certain land uses by other <br /> land uses is to be expected in virtually every community. The distribution of revenues and <br /> expenditures among various land uses in Gaston County that has been computed here is based on <br /> current land use patterns in the county. Determining whether or not this distribution is <br /> 6 <br /> G-4 Page 249 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.