AG 2015 12 14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Coborrus County Transportation Services (CCTS) Final Report - September 2015 Table 15: Prioritization of Initiatives for Next 5 Years, Listed by Initaitive 1.0 Connections to Greater Charlotte market support level high some little no unsure 1.1 Daily runs from Midland to Independence Boulevard (primarily medical) * * * * * * ** Deviated fixed route along US 29 from Concord Big Lots to UNCC (includes stop 12 amenities). Note: steering committee did not thing feasible at this time x x x x 1.3 Feeder service to 5 key stops along future CATS Route 80 on US 29 Feeder routes to CK Rider stops where CCTS existing drop -offs are highest - 1.4 addresses Mt. Pleasant and Harrisburg service gaps 2.0 Institutional Improvements 2.1 Policy Change: Convert van lending policy to volunteer driver program 2.2 Policy Change: Modify medical only out -of- county trips to allow workers to ride * * * * * * ** 2.3 Policy Change: Consider curb -to -curb vs. door -to -door service * * * * * * ** Tighten eligibility requirements to encourage greater use of /transfer to fixed ** * * ** ** 2.4 route 2.5 Fare increase proposal — zonal fare structure Additional training for staff— specifically Transit Manager and Mobility 2.6 Managers 2.7 Improve Hispanic representation on the TAB 3.0 Financial Proposals 1 3.1 Organizational restructuring (separate Dept. of Public Transportation or joint ** ** * * ** City- County system) Use FTA Urban 5307 Funds to enhance regional transit services— requires MPO ** * ** * ** 3.2 facilitatio Maximize use of 5310 Funds by purchasing service from an agency (80% 3.3 fed /20% local) 3.4 Accept maximum ROAD RGP funding I Access 5311 Rural Capital Funding for deviated bus stop improvements. Note: 3.5 steering committee did not thing feasible at this time x x x Explore options to fund a rural vanpool program. Note: steering committee did 3.6 not thing feasible at this time x x x 4.0 Developing Partner Agreements x Restructure CK Rider ADA contract so CCTS continues to provide this service. 4.1 Note: steering committee did not thing feasible at this time x x x x x MOU inter -local agreement for Out -of- County medical trips with Stanly and 4.2 Rowan Counties Enhanced CCTS secondary provider contract — base level of taxi trips written * * * * ** ** 4.3 into the agreement 4.4 Public- private partnerships for major and mini transit hubs * * ** * ** Create voucher /ticket /pass program to be administered and accepted by * * * * * * ** 4.5 potential partners Note: Each individual star represents one vote by a steering committee member — the blue shading is intended to emphasize whether the support for the initiative is strong, neutral, or weak. Attachment number 1 \n F -3 Page 172