Laserfiche WebLink
General Information <br />4 <br />• Appraisal requirements of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and <br />Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), revised June 7, 1994; <br />• Appraisal guidelines of City of Concord. <br />Prior Services <br />USPAP requires appraisers to disclose to the client any other services they have provided in <br />connection with the subject property in the prior three years, including valuation, consulting, property <br />management, brokerage, or any other services. We have not performed any services, as an appraiser <br />or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three -year <br />period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. <br />Scope of Work <br />To determine the appropriate scope of work for the assignment, we considered the intended use of <br />the appraisal, the needs of the user, the complexity of the property, and other pertinent factors. Our <br />concluded scope of work is described below. <br />Valuation Methodology <br />Appraisers usually consider the use of three approaches to value when developing a market value <br />opinion for real property. These are the cost approach, sales comparison approach, and income <br />capitalization approach. Use of the approaches in this assignment is summarized as follows: <br />Approaches to Value <br />Approach ApplicabiIitytoSubject Use in Assignment <br />Cost Approach Appl i cable Uti I ized <br />Sales Comparison Approach Not Appl icabl e Not Utilized <br />Income Capitalization Approach Not Appl icabl e Not UtiIized <br />The cost approach is the most reliable valuation method for the subject due to the following: <br />• There is sufficient data to develop reliable estimates of land value and replacement cost of the <br />improvements. <br />• This approach is typically most relevant for properties for which sales and rental data is <br />limited. <br />The sales comparison approach is not applicable to the subject because: <br />There is limited sales data for the subject property type, and adjustments to the data would <br />be relatively subjective. <br />The income approach is not applicable to the subject considering the following: <br />• There is not an active rental market for similar properties that would permit us to develop a <br />reliable estimate of the property's income generating potential. <br />The Glenn Center <br />irr <br />Attachment number 1 <br />H -5 Page 337 <br />