My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2013 10 21
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2013
>
AG 2013 10 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2013 3:20:23 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:03:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/21/2013
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FY2014 ROAP Program Schedule <br />ROAPfunds will he disbursed based on which deadline the applicant meets. <br />First Application Deadline September 16, 2013 <br />Disbursement if 1S Deadline is met (100 %) September 30, 2013 <br />Second Chance Application Deadline October 18, 2013 <br />Disbursement if 2nd Deadline is met (100 %) October 31, 2013 <br />County's Management of ROAP Funds <br />All counties are eligible to receive Rural Operating Assistance Program (ROAP) funding from the State of <br />North Carolina. As a recipient of ROAP funds, the county must implement administrative processes that will <br />ensure the following: <br />• ROAP funds are expended on needs identified through a public involvement and /or planning process. <br />• ROAP funds are expended on eligible activities only. <br />• Supporting documentation of expenditures is maintained. <br />• Service recipients meet eligibility requirements and their eligibility is documented. <br />• Trips funded with ROAD funding are monitored and evaluated throughout the period of performance. <br />• An accounting of trips and expenditures is provided in a semi - annual report to NCDOT. <br />• ROAP funds received and expended are included in the local annual audit. <br />Transportation Needs and Public Involvement in Funding Decisions <br />Yes or No <br />A. Did the county ask the Community Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), which is affiliated <br />with the community transit system, to recommend how the ROAP funds should be sub- <br />yes <br />allocated? <br />B. In addition to the public hearing notice and the public hearing, were other outreach efforts <br />conducted to inform the public about the availability of ROAP funds and to discuss <br />yes <br />transportation needs BEFORE the county decided to sub - allocate the ROAP funds? <br />C. Does the federally funded Community Transportation System operating in the county have a <br />Community Transportation Service Plan (CTSP) or Community Transportation Improvement <br />Yes <br />Plan (CTIP) that was developed in the last five years or being completed at this time? <br />Date of the plan: <br />D. Does your county have a Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan <br />(LCP) that provides a list of unmet transportation needs and /or gaps in transportation services? <br />yes <br />Date of the plan: <br />E. Does the county have other transportation plans that address public transportation needs? <br />yes <br />If yes, list and describe these plans. Client surveys <br />F. How did the county decide who would receive the ROAP funds? List the names of anyone who participated in the <br />decision to sub allocate the ROAP funds and their role in the community. <br />TAB BOARD: Dan Payne, Julia Paterson, Janet Purser, Patricia Baker, Vicki Proctor, Susan Caudle, Cindy <br />Hall, Sharon Corpening, Michelle Smith, Tony Harris, Jennifer Cagiano, Jody Rameriz <br />G. How did the county decide on the amount of ROAD funds to sub- allocate to a sub recipient? <br />DSS Decides who gets certified <br />Attachment number 4 <br />G -1 Page 135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.