My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2012 02 20
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2012
>
AG 2012 02 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 12:23:26 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:07:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
2/20/2012
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Markets awards grants to counties to formulate such plans. Certain narratives, structures and ideas have <br />been borrowed from these plans, and are noted accordingly. The various descriptive narratives contained in <br />this model plan are suggestions and can be changed to meet the special circumstances of an individual <br />county. <br />2 NCGS §106-735 et seq. <br />s NCGS § 106- 735(b). "Qualifying farmland" is defined in §106-737. <br />4 NCGS § 106 -744 (c)(1). <br />'NCGS §106-744(e)(1-5) <br />6 Such a plan might also be formulated by a planning agency or other advisory board such a soil and water <br />conservation district that has responsibility for land preservation in the county. <br />' Counties in other states that have formulated county farmland protection plans first compiled data from <br />agricultural censuses, real property tax roles, planning departments and soil and water conservation <br />districts. This data collection reveals information about changes in the number of farms in the county, their <br />ownership structure, soil types, number and value of agricultural assessments and on amount of land, and <br />planning and zoning regulations, all of which sketch the background needed to put the issue of agricultural <br />protection in perspective. <br />' This information can be generally supplied by the 1997 Census of Agriculture, Table 2, "Market Value of <br />Agricultural Products Sold and Farms by North American Industry Classification System: 1997 and 1992," <br />pp. 192 -204. An effort should be made to supplement this information with statistical updates from the <br />North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, as well as a local farmer survey to <br />capture transitions to alternative agricultural production. <br />9 This narrative model is adapted from the Steuben County, New York Agricultural Development and <br />Farmland Protection Plan. The specific economic figures demonstrated in the narrative are supplied by the <br />Census of Agriculture. The USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Services (MASS) conducts the <br />national agricultural census every five years. Currently, data is available from the 1997 census, with <br />statewide and county -level data available for North Carolina at http: / /www.nass.usda.gov /census <br />According to the NASS website, state and county data from the 2002 census will be released on the internet <br />in February 2004 <br />10 The 50 to 179 measurement is a statistical category in Census of Agriculture, and is chosen here as the <br />range containing the highest number of farms in North Carolina (18, 259 farms). <br />" This information can be found by county in Table 11 of the North Carolina summaries of the 1997 <br />Census of Agriculture, "Tenure and Characteristics of Operator and Type of Organization: 1997 and 1992" <br />12 1997 Census of Agriculture. The Conservation Reserve Program and Wetlands Reserve Program are <br />explained further in Article V. <br />" According to the statistics for all of North Carolina, while the number of farms between 1992 and 1997 <br />decreased the number of acres in farming increased by 186,364 acres. Results from individual counties <br />vary with some following this pattern, others not. <br />14 This information should be available from the Soil and Water Conservation District office for the district <br />in which the county is located. <br />" As noted above, county -wide farmland protection plans reviewed from other states are data - supported. <br />Prior to drafting a plan, in addition to collecting the census data described above, county farmers and <br />agribusinesses should be surveyed by the body or committee, perhaps the county's Agricultural Advisory <br />Board if the county has adopted a Voluntary Agricultural District ordinance pursuant to NCGS § 106 -738, <br />that has come together to address agricultural protection at the county level. This survey should put in real <br />terms the county farmers' and farmland owners' values, concerns, optimism about the future, etc. that will <br />guide framing of issues and their solutions in the county -wide plan. This survey data will give the <br />Agricultural Protection Plan credibility with county residents, and will have the effect of laying the <br />groundwork for future action. The challenges identified in this model are examples of what a survey would <br />likely reveal, and specifics should be inserted where appropriate. <br />16 These are concerns that have surfaced in surveys conducted in counties in other states. Because they <br />tend to be uniform across county and state lines, these are suggested, though more may certainly surface <br />specific to North Carolina or even the specific county. <br />1' Census of Agriculture, North Carolina Table 11, "Tenure and Characteristics of Operator and Type of <br />Organization: 1997 and 1992," p. 334. <br />" Ibid, pp. 334 -346 <br />20 <br />Attachment number 1 <br />G -1 Page 217 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.