Adequacy Determination
<br />As illustrated above, adequate school capacity at the middle and high school does not exist currently
<br />for this residential subdivision project, nor does it exist at the two year and five year review levels.
<br />(Note that according to Section 15 -9, Number 3, of the APFO, "... future available capacity must be
<br />"... equal to or greater than the projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed
<br />development for all school types," not just one or two.)
<br />Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities?
<br />Yes.
<br />Board of Commissioner Action Options:
<br />Option # 1
<br />Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined below
<br />The project is subject to a phasing schedule.
<br />In calendar year 2012, no more than 13 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2013, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2014, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2015, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2016, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2017, no more than 157 single family residential lots platted
<br />2. NTitigation of the pro-rata share of the cost of the planned capacity, which equals $7,631.00 per
<br />single family residential subdivision lot, payable prior to final platting
<br />Option # 2
<br />Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the phasing schedule proposed by the
<br />applicant.
<br />Applicant proposed phasing schedule.
<br />In calendar year 2012, no more than 48 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2013, no more than 77 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2014, no more than 52 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2015, no more than 53 single family residential lots platted
<br />2
<br />Attachment number 1
<br />G -2 Page 164
<br />Current
<br />Available
<br />Available
<br />Available
<br />Capacity
<br />Capacity
<br />Capacity
<br />Including
<br />Including
<br />Including
<br />Current
<br />Students
<br />Planned
<br />Students
<br />Planned
<br />Students
<br />Available
<br />Generated
<br />Capacity
<br />Generated
<br />Capacity
<br />Generated
<br />School
<br />Capacity
<br />by Project
<br />2 Yrs
<br />by Project
<br />5 Yrs
<br />by Project
<br />Harrisburg
<br />159
<br />86
<br />159
<br />86
<br />159
<br />86
<br />Elementary
<br />Hickory Ridge
<br />-105
<br />-137
<br />-105
<br />-137
<br />-105
<br />-137
<br />Middle School
<br />Hickory Ridge
<br />6
<br />-23
<br />6
<br />-23
<br />6
<br />-23
<br />High School
<br />Adequacy Determination
<br />As illustrated above, adequate school capacity at the middle and high school does not exist currently
<br />for this residential subdivision project, nor does it exist at the two year and five year review levels.
<br />(Note that according to Section 15 -9, Number 3, of the APFO, "... future available capacity must be
<br />"... equal to or greater than the projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed
<br />development for all school types," not just one or two.)
<br />Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities?
<br />Yes.
<br />Board of Commissioner Action Options:
<br />Option # 1
<br />Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined below
<br />The project is subject to a phasing schedule.
<br />In calendar year 2012, no more than 13 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2013, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2014, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2015, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2016, no more than 15 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2017, no more than 157 single family residential lots platted
<br />2. NTitigation of the pro-rata share of the cost of the planned capacity, which equals $7,631.00 per
<br />single family residential subdivision lot, payable prior to final platting
<br />Option # 2
<br />Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the phasing schedule proposed by the
<br />applicant.
<br />Applicant proposed phasing schedule.
<br />In calendar year 2012, no more than 48 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2013, no more than 77 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2014, no more than 52 single family residential lots platted,
<br />In calendar year 2015, no more than 53 single family residential lots platted
<br />2
<br />Attachment number 1
<br />G -2 Page 164
<br />
|