Laserfiche WebLink
I F�ne 'gy, <br />6.1 Results <br />Table 6 below tabulates the energy consumption, intensities, and costs before and <br />after implementation. Note that the total energy savings are estimated, and that the <br />extent of savings for each facility will be determined subsequent to re- commissioning <br />and further analysis. For the proposed retrofits to RCCC's South campus, the results <br />are estimated to lead to an approximate 20% reduction in overall consumption. <br />Table 6: Total energy use and cost before and after proposed retrofit <br />Quantity <br />Total Annual <br />Electrical Usage <br />(kWh) <br />Total Annual <br />Gas Usage <br />(CCF) <br />Total Annual <br />Energy Usage <br />(kBtu) <br />Total Annual <br />Energy Cost <br />($) <br />Baseline Case at Current Rates <br />2,396,950 <br />22,719 <br />10,554,016 <br />$170,266 <br />Proposed Design <br />1,909,145 <br />22,719 <br />8,446,505 <br />$136,266 <br />Projected Energy Savings <br />487,805 <br />0 <br />2,107,511 <br />$34,000 <br />Percent Improvement <br />20% <br />0% <br />20% <br />20% <br />Quantity <br />Total Annual <br />Electrical Usage <br />(kWh /ft <br />Total Annual <br />Gas Usage <br />(CCF /ft <br />Total Annual <br />Energy Usage <br />(kBtu /ft <br />Total Annual <br />Energy Cost <br />($ /ft) <br />Baseline Case per Current Rates <br />19.60 <br />0.186 <br />86.29 <br />$1.39 <br />Proposed Design <br />15.61 <br />0.186 <br />69.06 <br />$1.11 <br />Projected Energy Savings <br />3.99 <br />0.00 <br />17.23 <br />$0.28 <br />Percent Improvement <br />20% <br />0% <br />20% <br />20% <br />Rev A 2012 -05 -15 <br />Page 26 <br />Final Draft <br />G -2 Page 350 <br />