Laserfiche WebLink
Harrisburg and Midland, so they elected to be included in the county hazard <br />mitigation plan. The cities of Concord and Kannapolis opted to write their own plans, <br />and are not included in the county plan. <br />(b) A team from the Emergency Management Department and the Commerce <br />Department was formed to Review the existing plan and make appropriate revisions <br />when necessary. Each member of the Plans Team reviewed their specific areas of <br />responsibility and made changes as needed. <br />SUMMARY OF PLAN UPDATES <br />SECTION <br />DESCRIPTION OF PLAN UPDATES <br />Executive Summary <br />■ Revisions made to narrative text to <br />incorporate updated information regarding <br />the 2008 flooding. <br />Section I: Purpose <br />■ No revisions to this section. <br />Section II: Situation & Assumptions <br />0 Minor revisions to text of section. <br />Section III: Mission <br />■ Minor revisions to text of section. <br />■ Description of planning process enhanced <br />and updated. <br />■ A detailed summary of the update process <br />was added; including a description of the <br />process used, who served on the Plans <br />Team, how the public was involved, <br />summaries of meetings held and how the <br />general public and external stakeholders <br />were encouraged to participate. <br />• A detailed review and update of each <br />mitigation action listed including <br />responsible parties, support parties and <br />schedule. <br />Annex A: Hazard Identification and Analysis <br />■ Minor revisions to text of section. <br />• Modified the Fujita- Pearson Tornado <br />Intensity Scale to the updated Enhanced <br />Fujita Tornado Intensity Scale. <br />• Updated Wildfire incident data. <br />• Updated drought information narrative. <br />Hazard Mitigation Plan 7 1 December 2 8 0 00mber 4 <br />G -1 <br />