Laserfiche WebLink
bids will be extended any further, 2) one of the planned projects (Village <br />Park pedestrian tunnel /stormwater improvements) is an NCDOT project <br />leveraging federal ARRA funds and the City is required to pay NCDOT in <br />January 2011 for the local match for the project, 3) in this volatile <br />economic environment we need to take no chances on interest rates <br />changing in a way that is detrimental to the effort, and 4) there will be two <br />new seats on the Board of Commissioners in December which will further <br />delay this action due to the inevitable learning curve. <br />A few additional points to consider: <br />- The agreement between City and County will be the same as it has been <br />from the beginning. The County will only be obligated to half the debt <br />service from available revenues in the project development financing <br />district (the old TIF district). This is the only commitment. It will be the <br />City's debt. There is no pledge for general revenues by the County. <br />- As part of the agreement, the total amount of the proposed financing is <br />not to exceed $36,500,000. The agreement will also include a provision <br />for the County to proposed different terms to the City in 2020 and a <br />pledge to good faith negotiations at that time. <br />- There are two years of capitalized interest factored into the debt <br />schedule; therefore the County's obligation will not begin until June 2013. <br />- The structure will still include elements of a TIF but will be a publicly sold <br />COPs transaction of which the City will make the pledge for repayment. <br />There will probably be a side agreement with Castle and Cooke but it may <br />not have the same teeth the Minimum Assessed Valuation Agreement <br />(MAYA) had with the TIF. The proposed Interlocal Agreement calls for a <br />MAVA but it may ultimately take on another form. This provision only <br />effects the City. <br />- Because the CHA building will be collateral for the transaction, the City <br />will have to own the new building and will likely transfer it to the CHA (or <br />the County, if so desired) at the end of the debt period. The city is working <br />on an agreement that establishes how that will work. It will be CHA's <br />building in every practical way other than the name on the deed. The <br />agreement will address how it gets built, how the property gets acquired, <br />etc. <br />- Due to the lower interest rate, we will benefit from about $4 - 4.5 million <br />in additional revenues for the same debt service. I am recommending to <br />our City Council that we try to keep that in tact. We are working on some <br />alternatives for those uses including ideas that will generate new <br />economic growth and investment (on the NCRC or perhaps elsewhere in <br />Page 114 <br />G -3 <br />