My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2009 04 20
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2009
>
AG 2009 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2010 12:34:24 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:25:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
2/5/2010
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FACT SHEET <br />SB 967 (Creation of Yadkin River Trust) <br />' Senators Hartsell; Berger of Rockingham, Bingham, <br />Clodfelter, Purcell, Rand and Tillman <br />' In 1958, Alcoa received a 50-year federal license to utilize the Yadkin River to generate <br />hydro power. To support its case, Alcoa presented evidence that if the Government <br />granted it the license, it could create and maintain almost 1,000 jobs at the Badin <br />Aluminum Smelting Works because of the cheap power available. This promise was <br />specifically noticed as evidence of the public interest necessary to Brant the 1958 <br />license. <br />' Alcoa eliminated almost all of those jobs, which has closed its smelting facility. This has <br />created a devastating economic and environmental impact on the region. As Jack Betts <br />' recently noted in The Charlotte Observer, Alcoa "lost its best argument for renewal about <br />1,000 jobs ago." <br />If Alcoa receives another 50-year monopoly, this time Alcoa will not be using any of the <br />electricity generated by the Yadkin Project to create jobs for the people of North <br />' Carolina. Instead, Alcoa will use the public waters of the Yadkin River to generate <br />electricity at an enormous profit to be sold to the highest bidder on the interstate <br />electricity grid. <br />' Even worse, Alcoa could sell the license and the hydro project to a foreign company that <br />would exercise control over the waters that the law says belong to the people. <br />Despite what you may begin hearing, this bill has nothing to do with eminent domain <br />and does not take property from anyone. The federal government is the only entity <br />' that can decide to return control of the water to the State of North Carolina. <br />SB 967 simply creates an entity that can hold the federal hydro license in trust for the <br />benefit of the people of North Carolina if the federal government decides to give the <br />license back to the state. Alcoa acknowledged back in 1958 that the return of the license <br />and control of the water by the public was a condition of the 50 year license it received. <br />' In fact, in its relicensure application, Alcoa even set forth the statutory repayment price if <br />the federal government exercises its right to act on behalf of the people. <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The other argument you will hear is that this bill would cost North Carolina "millions" to <br />pay the statutory recapture price. In fact, it will cost the state nothing because the Yadkin <br />River Trust is designed with the ability to issue revenue bonds for the purchase and <br />improvements. Even if Alcoa's conservative estimate of an annual profit of $8 million is <br />accurate, the Yadkin River Trust will easily be able to finance the project without <br />costing the taxpayers of North Carolina one penny. <br />Prepared by Tracy Kimbrel% Mike Taylor and Bruce Thompson, Lobbyists for Stanly County <br /> <br />F-2 <br />Attachment number 2 <br />Page 47 of 320 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.