AG 2009 08 17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLAN COMMENTS: ^ Pre-submittal meeting bt:hveen developer and/or designer and reviewers is highly recommended, preferably onsite. ^ River Stream Overlay District/Zane on Coddle Creek tributary, are marked as required by the coturty zoning ordinance and permit CESAW-CO88-N-013-0061 issued under Section 404 of the U. S. Clean Water Act {33 U.S.C. 1413) by the US Anny Corps of Brtgirreers. ^ Unless developer has prior authorization from appropriate federal and state authorities to impact jurisdictional waters or wetlands, the proposed project will be in violation federal and/or state law. Permits for disturbance of streams and other wetlands must be requested from N. C. Division of Water Quality and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to any impacts.. ^ This project is withur a hydrological unit (HIJ) included nr the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program's Upper Rocky River Watershed Plan area and drains into a restoration protect that is in design phase. Every effort should be made to use best management practices to prevent water quality impairment and follow recarnmendations in the Watershed Management PIans & ],2.ecomrnendations Lower Yadkin / Upper Rocky River Baser Local Watershed PIannin~-Phase'Two. A key recommendation is low impact developtnerrt techniques patterned on pre-development stanmvater runoff conditions. The erosion and sedimentation control plan for this site should be followed closely once it has been submitted and approved. ^ The proposed development is approximately 800 feet upstream from the confluence of Indian Run with Coddle Creek. Coddle Creek received air "Impaired" water quality rating in the 2003 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. The plan notes that "...non-point source pollution, largely from stormwater runoff in acrd around Concord and Kannapolis, is likely a significant factor." Accordurg to the Plan, "Population is projected to increase .... 53 percent in Cabantis County... behveen 2000 and 2020. Growth manageient within the next five years will be imperative, especially in and around urbanizing areas and along highway corridors, izr order to protect or unprove water quality in this subbasin. Growth management can be defined as the application of strategies and practices that help achieve sustainable development in harmotry with the conservation of environmental qualities and features of an area. On the local level, growth management often involves planning and development reviews that are designed to maintain or improve water quality." ^ A conservatlort easement on all stream buffers is requested by Cabarrus Soil and Water Conservation District to protect stream restoration project downstream. This request is also part of the countywide open space initiative. See brochure "This Land is Our Land... A Guide for Preserving Your Land for Generations to Come. " ^ Impacts of stornnvater from this proposed project on water quality and water quantity have not been assessed. Cities of Concord and Kannapolis have applied to the NC Div. of Water Resources for an interbasni transfer of water certificate. Other jurisdictions receiving water from these municipalities are bound by the conditions of 1BT certificate's drought management plan. Under this certificate, stream buffers wilt be determined by a qualified professional to ensure proper application of stream buffer rules. ^ Cumulative and secondary impacts associated with this proposed development are not known and should be assessed prior to fmai plan approval. ^ The following prime fannland soil will be removed from production: CuB2. rarmland Cotrversion Impact Rating form (AD- 1006) must be filed if federal futrds are involved. Redesign of plan to provide for more open space protection of this soil is encouraged. ^ The following soil are classified as important state farmland soils and will be removed from production: CuD2 and EnB. ^ The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition, but does not elimhrate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1.00. Tire larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in this report are limited to the top S lnnitations. Additional limitations may exist. i-------------. Dwellings without Dwellings with Small Commercial Local Roads and Lawns and Shallow Excavations T4ap Soil Basements Basements Buildings Streets Landscaping SymboE Namc r-- Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited - (Somewhat limited Somewhat limited CuB2 Cullen ~hrink-swell - 0.5 ~ Shrink-swell - 0.5 Too clayey - 0.72 Not limited Shrink-swen - 0.5 }Shrink-swell - 0.5 Slope - 0.13 Low strength - 0 ~Cutbanks cave - 0.1 Somewhat limited ~ Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Somewhat fimitcd I CuD2 Cullen Slope - 0.63 ~ Slope - 0.63 Slope -1 Slope - 0.63 Too clayey - 0.72 Somewhat limited Shrink-swell - 0.5 ! Shrink-sFVell - 0.5 Shrink-swell - 0.5 Shrink-swell - 0.5 Slope - 0.63 Slope - O.b3 ~ LOFV strength - 0 CYrtbanks cave - 0.1 Very limited Very limited Very limited Sonte~vhat limited EnB Enon ~ Shrink-swell - 1 ~ Not limited Shrink-sweti - 1 Low strength -1 Too clayey - 0.28 ~ Not limited j } Slope - 0.13 Slvink-seel[ - I Cutbarrks cave - 0.1 ~.-- --------- --.----____._.--------I------___.._.-------- ---- Verylhnited -_- Very limited _ ~--`.--A-- ~--~ Very limited - Very limited Slope I PoR Poindexter ( Very limited ~ Slope -1 Very limited Slope - 1 Depth to soft SIope - i - Slope -1 ~ Depth to soft Slopa -1 ~~y strength - 0.22 bedrock - 0.46 Depth to bedrock [ bedrock - 0.46 Cutbanks cave - 0.1 0.46 Page 2 of 4 Rating Class and Rating Class and i Rating Class and ~ Rating Class and Rating Class and ~ Rating Class and Limiting Features - Limiting Features - Limiting Features - (Limiting Reatures - Limiting Features - ~ Limiting Features - ( Value ~ Value Value l Value Yalue I Value E-1 Attachment number 4 Page 61 of 315