Laserfiche WebLink
June 2009 - Planning & Zoning Draft Meeting Minutes <br />get way over his head in a project until he knows it is going to work. He has spent a ton of money on <br />it, but they have not transferred the property to him because he does not need 36 acres that cannot be <br />developed. <br />Mr. Dennis Testerman, Resource Conservation Specialist, 2490 Penninger Road, Concord, NC, <br />addressed the Boazd. He said Cabamts Soil and Water Conservation District (CSWCD) have been <br />working out in this area for probably five years. We were first approached by the Kirgan's who own <br />the property identified as Landmark Development; they had some problems with storm water runoff <br />from the school and he was helping them find some solutions to that. Subsequently, the state of North <br />Carolina identified an opportunity for restoring the stream that runs in the conservation easement and <br />the State of North Carolina is going to do a stream restoration project on that and will be starting fairly <br />soon. In light of already having an easement there, as the plans have come through for Rocky Glen <br />and Landmark Development which is in the City of Concon:l; he went to the City of Concord <br />Planning and Zoning Commission to see if he could get conservation easements on the feeder streams <br />that go into the stream that already has an easement on it to get some connectivity, and to get better <br />water quality benefits over the long haul. That is how we got into this project. <br />He showed the Rocky River Elementary School, Boulder Creek, Autumn Ridge and the proposed <br />boundaries for Rocky Glen on the map. He said it takes on two tracks and in the center is a pond and <br />the feeder stream that goes down and comes into another stream that already has an easement on it. <br />The Register of Deeds office has a recorded utility easement for the pipeline that goes down by the <br />pond and down to the point of the property. He said there is another easement across the proposed <br />Landmark Development. He said the pond has been there since 1956, the land was more open then <br />though you have wood in the general azea of the pond and on the steeper slope. The yellow lines are <br />10 foot interval contour lines; in addition to the stream shown the soils map shows another stream that <br />comes up and would have to be delineated by wetlands specialist under the inter-basin transfer <br />agreement with the county. He said there may actually be more area in there that needs to be buffered <br />then is indicated on the plans that are currently out there. <br />Mr. Testerman said they were very pleased that this came forth as an open space subdivision. He <br />thinks the inspiration for that when it was added into the county ordinance was that it would be a <br />conservation subdivision design concept. He said the conservation subdivision design premise is <br />if you start with the natural features on the land, and so the water quality feature there would <br />certainly be one of them and the other one would be prime farmland soil. Most of the upland on <br />Archibald road is prime farmland soil called Cullen. <br />The City of Concord has told Mr. Testerman that they received comments and submitted <br />comments back about a year ago, July 2008 and they do not have anything on record since then <br />of this dialogue going forward. He tries to go to the development review committee meetings <br />that the City of Concord hosts, which is where all there staff people come in and the developer <br />can come in and meet with them and try to get everybody on the same page. It certainly would <br />be a good opportunity to discuss a project like this. That has been part of the problem; you have <br />the City and County involved and there is really no great way to communicate other than getting <br />people together in the same room or send a lot of emails back and forth. The open space <br />subdivision design, as he understands it, is to trade off protecting primary open space and <br />secondary open space and giving higher densities as a result. Personally and professionally he <br />would like to see a higher level of protection for that primary open space, which is the area <br />Attachment number 9 <br />Page 77 of 315 <br />E-1 <br />