My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2007 09 17
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2007
>
AG 2007 09 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2009 12:18:22 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:31:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
9/18/2007
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-flat bids ranged 'fi-orra a low of $495,056.00 to a high of $574,80$.64 or a 13.9 percent <br />range. Excluding the highest bid, the :range al' P.he rcznaiaauag bids was within 8.1 percent. <br />Tlaetc was $10,425.76 or 2 percent Tango bttavttn Che lowest and second lowest bid. <br />Based oat this, BP Barber concludes the bids were sufficiently close to suggest a fair <br />bidding process. <br />BP Barber has reviewed the two (2) lowest bidders Fonder Company, Inc. and G:W. Liles <br />Construction L"ampany; lnc. in Chat order. BP Barber verified botka conapanits General <br />Contraactors l,icenst, which sat Both current fox 2007. <br />Ponder Company, hoc. submitted a bid of 849S,OS6 with an allowance x($8,000 for Che <br />metal roof. This includes a reductiaaa ok~$2,605.00 due to matheanatical errors. With the <br />alternative roof the bid was $503,456.00. G.W. Liles Construction Company subanitted a <br />bid for $50.5,481.76. This bid also inclu<es a deduction of $250.OU due to a mathtanaCical. <br />error. Also, this bid included an alternate Cotaling 511,f300 for the metal roof. The final <br />bid for G.W. Liles Construction Company with the alternative roof totaled $.517, 871.7fi. <br />BP Barber spoke with Kan Ponder on August 28, 2007 to verify changes to bid amounts. <br />Ma'. Ponder agreed to honor the total anuaunC that is listed above:. Mr. Liles was also <br />contacted ota August 28, 2007; ht agreed Co honor iht adjusted bid I~arice. <br />BP Barber also chttkcd all references that were submitted with these bids to verify <br />project experienet and conducted a brief interview with the owners and architecCS. The <br />prgjects described. by Goth bidders were in all cases acouratt and 'met the criteria required <br />in the Request:ior Bid:, Thebritfintcrview ofowntrs resulted in no caanpellangreason to <br />disqualify either bidder. <br />La aanclusian, based an the about infaranalion BI' Ba!-bea• believes the bid process was <br />fair and there is no tcnnptlling reason to disqualify the law bidder Ponder c~c Company ua <br />the amount of $495,OSfi.00 for fkae base bid ar $503,456.00 far the mttcal roof allsrnanC.. <br />If you have any questions please feel free ha contact me <br />Sincerely, <br />I3I' 13aber <br />Scott t,. Brown, PE <br />Regional Manger/ <br />Strnaor Prcrjtct Manager <br />~(] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.