Laserfiche WebLink
- Hand delivery (EPA Docket Centex, Environmental Protection Agency, Room 3334, 1301 <br />Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC). <br />(FnvuonmentalPmtection Agency,ltt ~// ~ ~g ~/ ~'/ IlntiorJnaagsie~^_~(171um1#hearings, Accessed 9/11/07) <br />Hi~toty of Ground-level Ozone Standards <br />Ground-Level Ozone Is One Of Six Common Pollutants For Which The Clean Air Act <br />Requires The EPA To Set National Standards. "Ground-level Ozone triggers a variety of health <br />problems even at very low levels and may cause permanent lung damage after long-term exposure. <br />It is one of six common pollutants fox which the Clean Aix Act requires EPA to set National <br />Ambient Aix Quality Standards (NAAQS). Vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions axe major <br />sources of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) that help to form ozone." <br />(U.S. Environmental Protection Agenry, hnp' / /u~ww~ epa govPii ~/ozunepollutiun /Histocy.hcml, Accessed 9/7/07) <br /> <br />1971 EPA established a 1-hour NAAQS ozone standard of 0.08 ppm. <br />1979 EPA revised the 1-hour standard to 0.12 ppm., <br /> The number of counties designated fox non-attainment reached 371. <br />1991 Concerned about the new science indicating adverse effects at levels <br /> allowed by that NAAQS, the American Lung Association went to <br /> court to compel EPA to act. <br />1994 EPA obtained a voluntary remand based on a promise to consider the <br /> newer studies. <br /> EPA and 37 eastem states form the Ozone Transport Assessment <br />1995 Group -work with stakeholders to study ozone transport fox two <br /> ears. <br /> EPA issued a three-volume criteria document encompassing hundreds <br />1996 of new scientific studies, fording "strong" scientific evidence of adverse <br /> health effects from ozone at levels allowed b the 1979 NAA S. <br /> Quly) EPA revised the air quality standards For ozone replacing the <br /> 1979 standard with an 8-hour standard se[ at 0.08 ppm. Three states <br /> (`Ohio, Michigan, And West Vixgixua*] and dozens of industry <br />1997 laintiffs uickl challen ed the new standards. <br /> (October) EPA acted on the work of the Ozone Transport Assessment <br /> Group and proposes NOx regional reductions in the eastem US. <br />1998 EPA issued the £mal rule on regional NOx reductions, known as the <br /> NOx SIP Call. <br />1999 The DC Circuit Court of Appeals sent the 1997 standards back to <br /> EPA fox further study. EPA appealed. <br /> The U.S. Supreme Court tmanixnously upheld the constitutionality of <br /> the Clean Aix Act as EPA had interpreted it in setting the 1997 health- <br />2001 protective air quality standards. The Supreme Court also reaffirmed <br /> EPA's long-standing interpretation that it must set these standards <br /> based solely on pubhc health considerations without consideration of <br /> costs. <br /> EPA began the process by which states (governors) and tribes submit <br />2002 recommendations fox what areas would be designated non-attainment <br /> (failing to meet the 1997 standard . <br />-~~ <br />