Laserfiche WebLink
Dr. Allan Legge <br />Final Review Comments: Allan H. Legge <br />"Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Policy Assessment of <br />Scientific and Technical Information" OAQPS Staff Paper, January 2007, EPA-452/R-07-003. <br />Chapter 7: Policy-Relevant Assessment of Welfaze Effects Evidence <br />Chapter 8: Staff Conclusions and Recommendations on a Secondary 03 NAAQS <br />Overall Comments: <br />The same underlying scientific assumptions used by Staff in the previous version of the Staff <br />Paper (July, 2006) with respect to the secondary 03 NAAQS aze still being used in this version <br />and are still seen as highly uncertain and as a result are still very problematic. While Staff has <br />made an admirable effort to more fully identify where uncertainties exist, the matter of the <br />propagation of error/uncertainty and its potential accumulative impact on their analysis still has <br />not been addressed. However, it is clear that Staff recognizes the importance of the need to <br />quantify these uncertainties, as some of these uncertainties are identified in their research <br />recommendations (pp. 8-27 to 8-29). <br />It is important to note that Staff has been at a maj or disadvantage preparing this Staff Paper due <br />to the fact that the state of the science regarding ambient ozone and vegetation/ecosystems has <br />not changed very much since the last 03 AQCD. Since the Agency has provided little or no <br />support for research in this area in the intervening years from 1996 to the present fo help remedy <br />this problem by improving the state of the science and hence reducing the scientific <br />uncertainties, the Agency must be strongly criticized for this lack of action. This is very <br />unfortunate because it is clear that a scientifically defensible and protective secondary 03 <br />standard is needed especially when there is evidence of foliaz injury from exposure to ambient <br />ozone at the current primary standazd. <br />Staff has attempted to get. around the `lack of adequate scientific information' .problem by <br />selectively using the results of a series of `elegant and imaginative' mathematical analyses drawn <br />from the revised technical document prepared for OAQPS by Abt Associates Inc. (2007)[ see <br />"Technical Report on Ozone Exposure, Risk, and Impact Assessment for Vegetation" -January <br />24, 2007]. The starting point of the analyses is the definition of the set of ozone metrics which <br />will be used and which aze all assumed to have a solid scientific foundation. The ambient ozone <br />data which are modeled and/or monitored are the input data which are then used in the <br />generation of the national potential 03 exposure surface (POES) after which these data aze <br />subject to various `rollback methodologies'. These data are then used to estimate crop and tree <br />ozone exposures which ultimately lead to an economic benefits assessment for agricultural crops <br />using AGSIM and tree growth simulation using TREGRO. Essentially, the results of each set of <br />analyses forms the basis for the next set of analyses and so on. It is the results of these `elegant <br />and imaginative' mathematical analyses which provide much of the foundation for the <br />conclusions drawn by Staff regazding the selected potential secondary 03 standards. That being <br />G_. ~-! <br />C-17 <br />