My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2007 10 15
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2007
>
AG 2007 10 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2009 12:18:33 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:31:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/15/2007
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASAC Ozone Review Panel Teleconference Meeting, March 5, 2007 Final: 04/17/2007 <br />susceptible populations, including elderly with preexisting medical conditions. Another <br />member commented that the Agency needs to significantly-strengthen its overall ozone <br />research efforts. <br />• The tables in the Final Ozone Staff Paper do not emphasize the adverse human health <br />effects, including the impact on lung development, associated with various levels and <br />multiple occurrences of ozone exposure. <br />Summary of the CASAC Discussion on the Secondar~3 NAAOS found in Chapter 8 of the <br />Final Ozone Staff Parser <br />With respect to the discussion of the secondary Ozone NAAQS in the Final Ozone Staff Paper, <br />Ozone Panel members included the following conclusions and other key points: <br />• The CASAC was unanimous in its support for the recommendation in the Final Ozone <br />Staff Paper that the protection of both crops and ecosystems requires a secondary Ozone <br />NAAQS that is substantially different from the primary ozone standard in averaging time, <br />level and form. <br />• Ozone is a regional -rather than simply alocal -pollutant. Panelists also reiterated <br />that adverse environmental effects result from a mixture of photochemical oxidants and <br />not merely ozone.' <br />• The Ozone Panel would prefer the sigmoidally-weighted W 126 index rather than the <br />SUM06 metric, and that the version of W 126 to be used should be equivalent to a <br />SUM06 level of 10-20 ppm-hours. In addition, the Ozone Panel members discussed the <br />summer "growing season." <br />Summary and Next Steps <br />Dr. Henderson reiterated that the CASAC's letter to the EPA Administrator on this subject <br />would not change the Final Ozone Staff Paper but was intended to inform the Agency's thinking <br />as it prepared to issue the notice of proposed rulemaking for ozone. The Chair requested that <br />Ozone Panel members send any inputs into the draft CASAC letter to the Administrator to her as <br />soon as possible, and also asked that Panelists send any initial or updated individual review <br />comments on the Final Ozone Staff Paper both to Dr. Henderson and to Mr. Butterfield no later <br />than March 12. The Chair thanked everyone on the call for their participation. <br />The DFO adjourned the meeting at approximately 4:00 p.m. on March 5, 2007. <br />U date: The CASAC's final letter/report (EPA-CASAC-07-002, dated March 26, 2007) from <br />the CASAC Ozone Review Panel's March 5, 2007 teleconference meeting was transmitted to the <br />Administrator on March 27, 2007, and was posted the next day on the SAB Web site at the <br />following URL: htto://www.epa.eov/sab/pdf/casac-07-002:pdf.] <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.