My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2005 03 21
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2005
>
AG 2005 03 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2006 9:49:35 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:35:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
3/21/2005
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br /> <br />those schools want even scratch thesurtace of taking care of this and these <br />other subdivisions. The Chair said it is a pretty plan, it's pretty clear and it says <br />it all. <br /> <br />Mr. Griffin said do we know anything about the build out rate for Moss Creek? <br /> <br />Mr. Lentz said as he understood from the developer that was like a ten year <br />project. <br /> <br />The Chair asked what is the build out rate of this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Killian said based on the absorption .at Heather Stone what they are doing is <br />about four to five a month roughly fifty a year, three hundred units about six <br />years for this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore said if we as a panel Charged with the responsibility of meeting the <br />needs of the citizens of the county as well as .those people who wish to do <br />business in this county see a problem, not with' a given project, but with an <br />overall area. Do we not have the authority to try to lessen that problem or at <br />least not acerbate it by adding to the Prob~ .,' <br /> <br />Mr. Koch said he does not thin:-o..~ance is written in such a way that it <br />allows the Board to look at one ~'~~Plications for preliminary subdivision <br />approval in the overall context of what else is happening in that area unless it is <br />something that would fall generally under the adequate facilities ordinance <br />aspect of it. He said from the reading of the ordinance you can see that when <br />they are looking at the ordinance and determining what they have to do to <br />comply with it the way the ordinance is written, they are to look at it only in a <br />context of what their proposed subdivision adds, not what it adds along with <br />everything else that maybe out there on the horizon. Mr. Koch said to answer <br />Mr. Moore's question speCifically he would haye to advice him to look at their <br />application in view of whether it has meet the requirements of the ordinance. <br />He said you cannot loo~ at it in an overall context of the general good of the <br />county, Mr. Koch said that would not be a good idea because the ordinance is <br />not written that way. He said until it is he will have to instruct the Board that <br />they would have to look at it in that more limited sense. <br /> <br />G,4- <br /> <br /> <br />The Chair said he feels Ii~e this project is not anywhere near filling the adequate <br />facilities ordinance. He said it is because of the statement from the school board <br />about this project. <br /> <br />Ms. Burns said to Mr. Koch does Mr. Kluttz's memorandum indicate to him that <br />there would be a problem meeting the adequate facilities ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.