AG 2005 03 21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

13 Mr. Koch said it would be helpful to state the findings in the motion. There being no further comments, the Chair MOTIONED to deny Petition COS- 06(5) with the following findings of fact: 1) Letter from Robert Kluttz's of the school board stating unequivocally there is not enough school capacity. 2) The 15 year Facility Plan does not include this subdivision or other subdivisions. The vote was seconded by Ms. Burns. The vote was unanimous. Petition CDS-06(S) Denied The Chair introduced the second item on the Agenda, Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval, Petition COS-07(S): 2. Applicant: Kiser Development Company Request: Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval This was a request to the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning Commission from Kiser Development Company to have their preliminary subdivision plat Pleasant Oaks approved. :\ ". Ms. Kassie Goodson, Plann~r addr~e~ Board presenting Petition COS-07(S) and staff report stating this (S\~ . going to be a customized residential subdivision, It is going to be a t~itional residential subdivision. Staff finds that the proposed subdivision meets all the development standards of the County' Subdivision Ordinance. However, the subdivision does not meet the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinanlte requirements for school facilities. Staff recommends approval of Pleasant Oaks Subdivision. It is recommended that the Planning Commission grant apprdval of the subdivision with the following condition: 1) That the developer ent~rs into a consent agreement with the Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners to meet the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance requirements for school; facilities. 2) The developer complies with all NCDOT . comments in order to rel;eive their final driveway permits. } . " G.4- Ms. Burns said there is a memo from the City of Concord Engineering staff. She said item number 10 says "the proposed location of the pump station and gravity sanitary sewer to it does not make good engineering sense. It appears that the gravity sanitary sewer Is bucking grade. /I She asked has there been any discussion of that. Mr. Lentz said during th~ preliminary plat stage we do not ask for full engineer drawings of those utility plans. He said he thinks what Concord is doing is giving us a general comment.