Laserfiche WebLink
~ Water & Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County <br />VVSACC Water and Wastewater System Master Plan <br /> <br />Safe Yield Update and Regional Drought Operations <br /> <br />Kannapolis is determined by the 1950's drought. For Lakes Fisher and Concord, the <br />drought of the late 1980's defines the 50~year safe yield. Generally, Lake Howell and <br />Kannapolis Lake are affected by similar droughts and Lakes Fisher and Concord are <br />affected by similar droughts, as shown in Table 3. <br /> <br />The similarities are attributable to the ability to refill the lake based on drainage area or <br />the lack of significant storage volume to capture the available inflow. These observations <br />are described for each reservoir, and they provide information for development of the <br />drought operations strategy. <br /> <br />I?.3.1 Lako Howell. Lake Howell is affected by droughts of long duration and low to <br />moderate inflow, similar to characteristics of the droughts of the 1920s and 1950s. <br />Droughts of extremely iow inflow, but shorter duration, like the 1980's drought, do not <br />affect Lake Howell greatly because of the large volume stored. The most recent drought <br />exhibited long duration, from 1998 through 2002, and very low inflows. The ratio of <br />Lake Howell's usable volume to its drainage area ratio is 112.7 million gallons/square <br />mile. <br /> <br />2.3.2 Lake Fisher and Lake Concord. Lake Fisher and Lake Concord hold much <br />less storage, and they do not respond well to very Iow inflows, even of short duration. <br />The drought of the 1980's exhibited these characteristics. Over a longer duration, small <br />storms may occur that refill the smaller storage volume. They both respond well to <br />longer duration droughts of low to moderate inflow, like the 1920's and 1950's droughts. <br />Their refill capabilities are due to larger drainage areas,, relative to their usable volumes. <br />Their usable volume to drainage area ratios are similar.. Lake Fisher holds 40.1 million <br />gallons for each square mile of drainage area, and Lake Concord holds 38.1 million <br />gallons for each square mile of drainage area. <br /> <br />£.3.$ Kannapolis Lake. Kannapolis Lake exhibits characteristics of both types of <br />reservoir, due to its smaller volume, but greater refill capacity from Second Creek. <br />Considering only the lake's watershed, Lake Kannapolis contains nearly 89 million <br />gallons of usable volume per square mile of drainage area. If the Second Creek drainage <br />area (55.6 mi2) was considered, then the refill capability increases dramatically. <br /> <br />PN 096873.0800 1 7 ~-'~, <br />January 23, 2004 BLACK & VEATCH <br /> ~1,~ .d~,I International Company <br /> <br /> <br />