Laserfiche WebLink
July 26, 2004 ~ ,2 ~' Page 580 <br /> <br />the Cabarrus Animal Control and Preservation Task Force as presented with the <br />exception that the at-large appointments to the Committee would be made as <br />follows: One at-large member involved in a recognized humane animal <br />organization [501(c) (3) or Letters of Incorporation] for a term of two years; <br />One citizen at-large member for a term of two years; One at-large member <br />involved in a recognized humane animal organization [501(c) (3) or Letters of <br />Incorporation] for a term of one year; and One citizen at large member for a <br />term of one year. Further, the Board authorized a budget amendment <br />appropriating $15,000.00 from Contingency to the Animal Control budget for <br />educational materials and appropriating $25,000.00 from Contingency to the <br />Social Services budget to provide an auxiliary spay/neuter service to <br />qualified indigent persons/families. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Carpenter encouraged persons ~nterested in serving on the <br />new committee to submit an application. Also, she expressed appreclation to <br />the local veterinarians who have agreed to help with the spay/neuter program, <br />to Patsy Beeker and Cabarrus CARES for their efforts and to local merchants <br />for their donations to the CARES program. <br /> <br />(G-3) O~tions Regardin~ a Full Time Construction Manager for the Jail <br />Pro~ect <br />(G-4) Desi~nation of Votin~ Delegate to the N. C. Association of County <br />Comm~ssioners Annual Conference on Auc~ust 19-22, 2004 <br />(G-S) Discussion of Design and Development Standards for Co=~nercial <br />Development <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Acting Chairman Carruth, seconded by Commissioner <br />Carpenter and unanimously carried, the Board tabled Items G-3, G-4 and <br />until its August 16, 2004 meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion of Purchasing O~tions for Future School Sites <br /> <br /> John Day reported there are insufficient funds in the budget to <br />purchase land for new school projects on the November bond referendum. <br />However, he stated there are sufficient funds available to acquire options <br />for land purchases. He reported that Dr. Winkler is supportive of this <br />effort and the School Board and Board of Commissioners would be updated <br />regularly with the Board voting on the land options at a later date. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Acting Chairman Carruth, seconded by Commissioner <br />Carpenter and unanimously carried, the Board directed the County Manager, <br />County Attorney and staff to negotiate purchase options for land required for <br />school construction projects and to contract with a third party, if <br />necessary, to negotiate with land owners on these possible options. <br /> <br /> Mr. Day reported the Guiding Principles for School Development endorsed <br />by the Board in June had been sent to all municipalities and will be <br />considered at future meetings. Also, the Board of Education plans to <br />consider these principles at a future meeting. <br /> <br />(G-7) Personnel Ordinance Inconsistency <br /> <br /> Don Cummings, Human Resources Director, reported on an inconsistency in <br />the Personnel Ordinance. He stated Article III, The Pay Plan, contains <br />language that can impact the promotion of employees or when their position is <br />substantially reclassified. The ordinance provides for a 10 level <br />(approximately five percent) ~ncrease or an increase to the entry salary of <br />the new salary grade, whichever is greater. However, permanent salary <br />increases are limited to 10 percent in a fiscal year and sometimes these <br />changes are more than two grade levels. He pointed out that a vacant <br />position could be filled by hiring an applicant that is not a County employee <br />at the entry level of a salary grade. However, promoting a County employee <br />would not be possible because the entry level salary at the new grade would <br />exceed the employee's 10 percent maximum increase. Additionally, a position <br />that is substantially reclassified, three grades or more, would result in <br />similar inconslstencies. These reclassifications, while rare, are possible <br />due to changes in duties, qualifications, and/or responsibilities. Mr. <br />Cummings cited several examples in which the 10 percent limit would cause a <br />problem, such as the 13 percent increase that would occur if a Deputy Sheriff <br />(Grade 6S/Level 16) is selected to be a Sergeant (Grade 69). He recommended <br />the language in Article III limiting permanent salary increases to a 10 <br />percent maximum during a fiscal year be revised to allow an exception when an <br />employee is entering a higher grade at the entry level. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Acting Chairman Carruth, seconded by Commissioner <br />Carpenter and unanimously carried, the Board revised Article III of the <br /> <br /> <br />