My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2003 04 21
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2003
>
AG 2003 04 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2006 9:37:36 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:40:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
4/21/2003
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Process for Selection of A~'_ chitect <br /> <br />Thirteen firms responded t6 the request for qualifications mailed Feb. 5th and posted on <br />the county web site. ~ <br /> <br />The Board of Commissiom~rs appointed a screening committee with the following <br />membership: <br /> <br />County Commission Chairman Robert Freeman <br />County Commission Vice Chairman Richard Suggs <br />Sheriff Brad Riley <br />Resident Superior Court Ju~lge Erin Spainhour <br />Chief District Court Judge William Hamby <br />Clerk of Court Gene Morril <br />District Attorney Roxann ~aneekhoven <br />Interim County Manager JOhn Day <br />Planning Services Director lonathan Marshall <br />Senior Planner Janet Slack i <br /> <br />The screening committee his reviewed the submissions and narrowed the field to 3 firms: <br />HDR, Ware Bonsall Arshit~cts and Moseley, Wilkins & Wood, all with offices in <br />Charlotte. Each firm will rrfiake a presentation to the screening committee Monday, April <br />28th, beginning at 5:30 PM tn the multipurpose room at the Governmental Center. Board <br />members may wish to attend. <br /> <br />It is likely that the committ4e will visit completed projects designed by some or all of the <br />3 finalists. The Board may Wish to participate in these visits. <br /> <br />The committee will recornnltend 1 or 2 firms to the Board for consideration. The Board <br />will make the final decisio~on which firm is hired for the project. <br /> <br />Sul~ltested Process for Sel~ting a Site <br /> <br />After the architectural firm has determined the space requirements for each component of <br />the justice center, potential ~ites (including those already mentioned) can be identified <br />and evaluated. Evaluations~hould include costs (e.g., land, site preparation, <br />construction), functionalityoaccessibility, ability to phase construction, expansion <br />capability, and social and e~nomic impacts. <br /> <br />The findings will be presen~,d to the Board in a regular meeting. Following that, an open <br />house session will be held t~b solicit public comment on the various sites under <br />consideration. : <br /> <br />The Board will then select a site based on all the information and comments gathered. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.