Laserfiche WebLink
Howard Hurlocker suggested that we stay away from creating an overlay district <br />- to him, overlay districts say "what I can't do, not what I can do." He would, <br />however like to see a design for what can be done on Cabarrus Avenue in terms <br />of a mixed use project. He said they could look at focussing on the overall <br />amenities that are already downtown - like the shops, restaurants, government <br />buildings and library. He said we need to not focus on what we don't have <br />downtown. He said the City needs to look at services that are offered downtown <br />to encourage new businesses to feed off of them. He said that he needs to see <br />some positive designs. <br /> <br />David added that we need to concentrate things together - a little incentive goes <br />a long way. He said this all gets back to economics. There has to be something <br />in place to stimulate development. The City might consider giving land to <br />someone who is willing to do the actual vertical construction and that could be a <br />good deal for both the developer and the City. <br /> <br />Carlos asked about the City's Armory project. Jeff said it would be 17 lots. The <br />lots will be sold with the house already built but that the City will contract with <br />local developers to construct the dwellings. David added that in order to get <br />authenticity into the development, they should be done by different developers - <br />it will make for a better product. Let the City do the infrastructure, let the <br />developers do the design. There needs to be diversity so that all neighborhoods <br />don't look like factory products. David said that a small builder can make a living <br />doing projects like this. Howard added that it is all small builders can do these <br />days because they can't afford to meet all of the new standards. Infill (from a <br />planning standpoint) could be enough of an advantage to smaller builders if they <br />have something to work on and have some incentive to take the project on. <br /> <br />Ted suggested that guest speakers familiar with the issue of infill be brought in to <br />discuss the issue with the Committee. Jeff added that Louis Mack at the CDC, <br />David McClellan, Len Sossaman, Harry McKay, Laine Harling would all be <br />knowledgeable about this topic. David asked what about someone from Code <br />Enforcement? Carlos suggested that Steve Osborne attend the next meeting to <br />talk about infill and how it relates to Code Enforcement and the Center City Plan. <br /> <br />Jeff asked Margaret Pearson if she had anything to contribute related to this topic <br />and she responded by saying that she didn't. <br /> <br />Howard and Ted stated that this issue needs to be tackled on a large scale since <br />it is so political. Carlos added that in downtown Charlotte, they went to different <br />wards, demolished certain areas and started again. Those areas that they left <br />alone are now thriving and worth far more because of the redevelopment. This <br />type of redevelopment could seriously benefit Concord. Jeff stated that in order <br />to facilitate the large scale projects there has to be a plan to go by. He stated <br />that staff will be prepared to give a presentation on the Center City plan and how <br />it relates to the infill issue at the next meeting since that is the basic framework <br /> <br />UDO ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MARCH 26, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />