My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2003 09 15
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2003
>
AG 2003 09 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2006 9:38:06 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:41:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
9/15/2003
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
experience in CDBG administration. This company has two employees with General <br />Contractor licenses. <br /> <br />Centralina Council of Governments <br /> <br />This proposal is for $58,000 project fee and $3,500 planning fee for a total of $61,500. <br />This is billing at $97.00 per hour. This proposal includes salaries, benefits, travel <br />expenses, secretarial, long distance charges, and overhead costs. The project team would <br />consist of three members with over 65 years of combined experience: two administrators <br />and one rehabilitation specialist. The CCOG has administered many CDBG Housing <br />Rehabilitation programs all over the region. References and phone numbers were <br />provided for many similar projects. <br /> <br />G.M. Wilson & Associates <br /> <br />This proposal is a fixed fee price of $49,800 for administration. This fee also includes all <br />overhead, travel and miscellaneous expenses. This is charging at $40 to $50 per hour <br />depending on the staff member. This proposal includes a staff of four for the project. <br />This is a project manager, project coordinator, rehabilitation specialist and a 'compliance <br />expert. The staff has administered CDBG grants for over twenty years in this area. <br /> <br />Stark Associates provided the least expensive proposal and scored the best on the <br />evaluation criteria due to the knowledge of the project and availability to the county. All <br />proposals were acceptable and siaff feels could be carded out effectively by any of the <br />organizations. Staff recommends hiring Stark Associates based on price, knowledge and <br />administration of other community development programs with which programs can be <br />combined to provide clients with more coordinated and extensive service. Staff <br />recommends hiring contingent upon funding being granted by the Division of <br />Community Assistance and state approval of the contract. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.