My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2002 01 28 (Regular)
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2002
>
AG 2002 01 28 (Regular)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2006 5:00:54 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:42:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
2/28/2002
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
259 <br /> <br />for FY 2003 and FY 2004 and appoint a task force consisting of a one member <br />each from the Chamber, the Board of Commissioners and EDC to develop <br />alternatives as to what would be the best model for EDC in Cabarrus County. <br />He also asked that the Board delay a decision concerning the operation of EDC <br />until all County Commissioners could be present. <br /> <br /> There was lengthy discussion regarding the County's method of funding <br />EDC and the advantages of EOC operating as an independent non-profit <br />corporation. Currently, funds allocated to EDC and not spent during the <br />fiscal year come back to the County's general fund. As a separate entity, <br />the County Commissioners would establish the amount of funds allocated to EDC <br />each year and any unspent funds would remain with EDC for future use. Also, <br />the non-profit status would allow EDC to seek funding from private businesses <br />and foundations. Other issues addressed during discussion included the <br />following: (1) expense of operating EDC as a separate entity; (2) whether to <br />establish EDC as an independent organization by July l, 2002, or in one to <br />two years; and (3) the possibility of obtaining municipal funding along with <br />private funding for EDC. Also, Commissioner Fennel proposed the establishment <br />of a finance oversight committee that would be responsible for reviewing and <br />signing off on all expenditures by EDC. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ewing stated that administratively there would be no problem with <br />the establishment of a finance oversight committee. Also, he said he is <br />currently working to develop cost estimates for operating EDC as a separate <br />entity. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Fennel, seconded by Commissioner Privette <br />and unanimously carried, the Board deferred a decision concerning the <br />Economic Oevelopment Corporation (EDC) until the Board meeting on January 28 <br />with estimated cost figures for operating EDC separately from County <br />government to be available at that time. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Privette questioned the relationship between the Chamber <br />of Commerce and EDC on economic development activities. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox stated it was his understanding that the Chamber's role is more <br />of support and identifying and addressing needs' of existing businesses as <br />compared to the recruiting role of EDC. He stated the Chamber stands ready <br />to bring all resources available and be a full partner with EDC. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Fennel distributed copies of a 1994 proposal to establish <br />a Sports Authority in Cabarrus County. The proposed Authority would be <br />dedicated to using sports as an economic development tool for the county. <br /> <br /> Chairman Freeman thanked members of the EDC Board for attending the <br />meeting. He recessed the meeting of the Board of Commissioners for several <br />minutes. <br /> <br /> Chairman Freeman reconvened the Board at 7:55 p.m. <br /> <br />Cable Television Rates <br /> <br /> Mr. Day reviewed a proposed procedure for addressing cable television <br />rate adjustments. He explained the cable company could increase rates each <br />year if the increases comply with guidelines established by the Federal <br />Communications Commission (FCC). To eliminate the need to bring the issue <br />before the Board each year, Mr. Day suggested the Board consider adopting a <br />resolution approving any cable rate increase that complies with the FCC- <br />approved formulas and delegate to the County Manager the responsibility for <br />determining whether a particular rate schedule complies with the resolution. <br /> <br /> There was discussion regarding the Board's authority in considering <br />cable rate adjustments and the fact that cable television is a voluntary <br />service. The Board took no action regarding the handling of cable rate <br />issues. <br /> <br />Closed Session <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Suggs <br />and unanimously carried, the Board moved to go into Closed Session to discuss <br />matters concerning economic development issues as authorized by North <br />Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a) (4); and to consult with the County <br />Attorney concerning pending litigation and to consider and give instructions <br />to the County Attorney concerning the handling or settlement of a potential <br />claim, judicial action or administrative procedure as authorized by North <br />Carolina General Statute 143-318.11{a) (3). <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.