Laserfiche WebLink
the maintenance of W. W. Flowe Park. All costs of this fund are allocated.among the Electric, <br />Water, Sewer, Aviation and General Funds based on percentages derived from a cost allocation <br />method. <br /> <br />Aviation Fund: The Aviation Fund budget for 2002-2003 totals $8,842,521 compared with. <br />$9,520,026 for the current 2001-2002 budget. The Aviation budget is comprised of $5,095,172 in <br />operating revenue, non-operating revenues of $2,250,000, and a transfer of $1,497,349 from the <br />Electric Fund. The decrease is due to the retirement of debt service and conservative fuel sales <br />estimates. <br /> <br />Golf Course Fund: The Golf Course Fund budget, in its fifth full year of operations, totals <br />$2,135,557 for 2002-2003. The Golf Course Fund is comprised of operating revenues of <br />$1,400,603, non-operating revenues of $410,679 and a transfer from the General Fund of <br />$324,275. There is no significant change in the Golf Course Fund Budget from 2001-2002 to <br />2002-2003. <br /> <br />TOUGH DECISIONS FOR CHALLENGING TI/VIES <br /> <br />STATE FISCAL CRISIS <br /> <br />As mentioned earlier, the withholding of dollars due the City of Concord for reimbursement and <br />state collected local revenues has dominated the budget process. Governor Easley's action meant <br />the City of Concord lost ovei' $1.7 million in budgeted revenues in FY 2000-2001. As a result, <br />the City has frozen selected monies in departmental budgets and has used fun. d balance to make <br />sure this potential loss will not result in a budget that is out of balance at the end of the fiscal <br />year. <br /> <br />In other words, the City took steps to mak, sure its revenues, even if the reimbursement money <br />was not forthcoming, matched its expenditures, This sounds simple but it has not been that <br />simple for our State government. Increases in services, reductions in taxes and over zealous <br />revenue projections have led to the State budget woes. Local government officials live and work <br />with those generating the revenues to pay for their services. I would dare say that if this <br />happened at the local level, there would be a much greater call for accountability. Unfortunately, <br />it has resulted in part of responsibility for paying for the mistakes at the State level being pushed <br />to city and county governments. Many have even made the absurd comment that because the <br />state government revenue projections have been overly optimistic, that local governments should <br />have to pay because they have fund balances and the state does not. Local governments are at the <br />mercy of the state because of the severe limitations the state places on our ability to generate <br />revenues, yet the state shows little mercy to the local governments it controls. <br /> <br />It is up to the General Assembly to decide if their revenue and cash flow problems will impact <br />Concord's FY 2002-2003 budget and state collected local government revenues. There are <br />several proposals that address both State and local revenue sources. Regardless what happens <br />with Governor Easley's proposed lottery and the suggestion of moving up the implementation of <br />the half cent local option sales tax, there needs to be serious thought given to provide local <br />governments with a menu of local option revenues to choose from that elected officials can use to <br />match local needs and economies. Even if approved, the enactment of the half-cent sales tax will <br />depend on the action of the Cabarrus County Commissioners. Thus, there is a real possibility that <br />the City of Concord will lose over $1.6 million or even more in this budget year. This represents <br />three cents on the property tax rate. If this happens this budget basically defers the decision to <br />make fundamental changes to increase revenues and/or decrease services to next fiscal year in <br />hopes there will be a permanent resolution to this problem. <br /> <br /> <br />