Laserfiche WebLink
COMPARZSON AND ANALYSTS WZTH EXTSTTNG ORDZNANCE <br /> <br />ARTZCLE 2 <br /> <br />Purpose: Article 2 established the role of the Planning Administrator and his or <br />her designees, It also establishes the str..u~ure, roles, and charges of the <br />various commissions. <br /> <br />Major Points Discussed: <br />· Establishment of Planning Department, Planning and Zoning Administrator, <br /> Board of Adjustment, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Historic <br /> Preservation Commission. <br />· Describes powers and duties of each Board or Commission. <br /> <br />Major Similarities/Differences: <br />· Establishes Historic Preservation Commission, which will not be applicable in <br /> Cabarrus County's jurisdiction. <br />· The UDO, in great detail, describes the legal criteria for decisions regarding <br /> variances and conditional uses. These guidelines are already in place; <br /> however, they are not spelled out in great detail in the current ordinance. <br /> This level of detail is again an effort to increase the defensibility of the UDO. <br /> <br />Examples: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />