Laserfiche WebLink
Talde4.7~,t_ inciedthemaximum Imperv!Ous Surfa¢~e Ratlo for the C-2 district from 0.7 <br />- (~%(~overage) to 0;8 (80% coverage)to morocloseiy conform to current <br />~ standards (this applies to Kannapolis and Concord only, see next item below) <br />T~abl~7~-I~ ' ': - = l~fn=~G~_iou/s~6urface Ratio Low on RV, RC, 8-1, C-t, O-I, C-2. C-2 was changed <br />- . . fr0m:70-°/~o.~to 80%coverage <br /> <br />Table 4.7-t removed the "maximum" front setbacks from all non-residential districts <br /> except the CC district <br />Table 4.7-t added statement that duplexes require 1.5 times the minimum required lot <br /> size for single family homes <br /> <br />Tab[~4~?:t * - AGdensifl~s are too Iow and may devalue property, this standard already <br />· ' matct~eetheadopted policy within ~the Rimer Overlay District <br /> <br />Sect. 4.7.6 eliminated Sect 4.7.6 related to the use of substandard lots <br />Sect. 4.8.2 made Cluster Developments Conditional Uses (w/Board of Adjustment <br /> approval) in the listed zoning categories <br />Sect. 4.9.4.2 corrected reference to 6.5 <br />Sect. 4.9.6 add registered land surveyors to project design team for Planned Unit <br /> Developments <br />Sect. 4.10.7.t.1 amended reference form arterials to thoroughfares to match language used in <br /> our transportation plans <br />Sect. 4.12 eliminated sect 4.12 Historic Preservation Overlay <br />Sect. 4.14 amended references from appendix C to Appendix D for; 4.14.12.7, 4.14.13.2, <br /> 4.14.18.1,4.14.t8.4, 4.14.23.1 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />