My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2001 10 22
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2001
>
AG 2001 10 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:54:33 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:46:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/22/2001
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2142 <br /> <br /> Before the <br />Federal Communications Commission <br />Washington, D.C. 20554 <br /> <br />In the Matter of: <br /> <br />TIME WARNER CABLE <br /> <br />Appeal of Local Rate Order lssued by <br />Cabarms County, North Carolina <br /> <br />CUID NCO 173 <br />File No. CSB-A-0663 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER <br /> <br />Adopted: August 31, 2001 <br /> <br />Released: September 14, 2001 <br /> <br />By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: <br /> <br />I. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br /> 1. Time Warner Cable ("TWC") the franchised operator of a cable system serving Cabarrus <br />County, North Carolina ("County"), has appealed the rate decision adopted by the County on February <br />19, 2001. The contested rate decision denied the operator's request to increase rates charged for basic <br />service2 The issue is whether the County issued a written rate decision that properly explained its denial <br />of TWC's proposed rates. The County did not file an opposition to the appeal. <br /> <br /> 2. Under the Commission's rules, rate orders issued by local franchising authorities <br />("LFAs") may be appealed to the Commission.2 In ruling on an appeal of a local rate order, the <br />Commission will not conduct a de novo review, but instead will sustain the franchising authority's <br />decision provided them is a reasonable basis for that decision, and will reverse a franchising authority's <br />decision only if the franchising authority unreasonably applied the Commission's rules in its local rate <br />order? If the Commission reverses a franchising authority's decision, it will not substitute its own <br />decision but instead will remand the issue to the franchising authority with instructions to resolve the case <br />consistent with the Commission's decision on appeal.' <br /> <br />~ Appeal of Local Rate Order (March 21, 2001); Exhibit A, Letter from John D. Day, Deputy County Manager, to <br />Robert Melton, General Manager, Time Wamer Cable (March I, 2001) <br />2 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. <br /> <br />~ See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate <br />Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd <br />5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer <br />Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 <br />(1994) (" Third Reconsideration "). <br />4 Rate Order at 5732. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.