My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2001 11 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2001
>
AG 2001 11 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:54:59 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:46:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
11/19/2001
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes <br />October 18, 2001 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Mr. Drye MOTIONED to approve <br />Petition C99-06(S) subdivision extension for two years, seconded <br />by Mr. Wilder. The vote was unanimous. <br /> <br />The Vice Chair introduced the second item on the Agenda, Preliminary <br />Subdivision Plat Approval, Petition C01-05(S): <br /> <br />Applicant: Rhein Znterests of Charlotte~ LLC <br />Request: Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval <br /> <br />This was a request to the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning <br />Commission from Rhein Tnterests of Charlotte, LLC to have their <br />subdivision plat Highland Creek Revision approved preliminary. <br /> <br />Mr. Rodger Lentz, Senior Planner, addressed the Board presenting <br />Petition C01-05(S) and staff report stating Highland Creek was <br />approved several years ago. On that zoning approval they asked <br />for 1,134 lots. He said on the replacement map that they have <br />tonight there are 130 additional lots added. This brings the <br />subdivision total to 1,261 lots. <br /> <br />Mr. Lentz said staff finds that the proposed subdivision meets all <br />the development standards of the County's Subdivision Ordinance. <br />The adequate public facilities ordinance requirements should not be <br />considered as they have a vested right to :[,134 lots and a standing <br />agreement with the Board of Commissioners 'regarding the <br />adequate public facilities ordinance requirements. He said Fletcher <br />Hartsell has reviewed the existing consent agreement with <br />Highland Creek and states that the agreement will address the <br />proposed revisions. Mr. Lentz said [here are 130 additional lots not <br />covered by that agreement. This subdivision does meet the <br />standards of the subdivision regulations, the zoning ordinance and <br />those technical standards. He said there are some new lots in this <br />subdivision that would come under the adequate public facilities <br />ordinance. Schools are still inadequate based on the report, so <br />staff recommends denial of this subdivision based on the adequate <br />public facilities ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Dwiggins asked Mr. Lentz was he talking about not approving <br />the entire project. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.