Laserfiche WebLink
225 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />E. IMPLEMENTATION [AS OF DATE OF MOST RECENT APPLICABLE AMENDMENT) <br /> <br />1. This policy shall become effective upon enactment. All <br /> subsequent appointments to boards by the Board of Commissioners <br /> shall be carried out under the provisions of this policy. <br />2. Any individual affected by the dual role provision of this policy <br /> shall be given the option of determining which appointment to <br /> retain and any other appointments held by that individual to <br /> boards, commission or committees shall be deemed null and void <br /> unless waived by the Board of Cor~missioners under the special <br /> circumstance clause of this policy. <br />3. Persons who have served on boards, commissions and com~ittees for <br /> a period exceeding six consecutive years at the time this policy <br /> becomes effective shall serve until the end of the current term <br /> or for a period of 12 months f~om the date of this policy if the <br /> tprm extends longer than 12 months. <br />4. In order to get more participation and involvement from county <br /> residents, the County should advertise in local papers at least <br /> twice each year of up-coming vacancies. Any application that is <br /> received concerning the vacancies should be given careful <br /> consideration, assuming they are qualified. <br /> <br />NOTE: Firemen's Relief Fund Trustees and Fire District Commissioners are <br />exempt from the Appointment Policy <br /> <br />Adopted June 21, 1982 <br />Amendments: (1) January 17, 1995; (2) April 21, 1997; (3) December 21, 1998; <br /> (4) November 5, 2001 <br /> <br />Tax Administration <br /> <br /> MS. Dawn McHale, Tax Administrator, reviewed the revaluation process <br />and the proposal to postpone the 2003 revaluation. The Board had briefly <br />discussed this issue at the conclusion of its work session on October 13. <br />During her presentation, Ms. McHale addressed personnel, technology and <br />training related issues associated with the proposed postponement of the <br />revaluation. These included changes in key staff positions since the 1999 <br />revaluation, cross training of staff members and the need for additional <br />staff training on new computer software. Ms. McHale also reported that new <br />tools (digital photography of the entire county and enhanced GIS and mapping <br />software) would be available in the sunu~er of 2002 and would add quality to <br />the revaluation process if it is delayed to 2004. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bill Ferriss, local business owner, outlined his eKperience in <br />property tax and revaluation matters, including the following: (1) Employee <br />of the Mecklenburg County Tax Office in the 1970's; (2) Owner of a <br />revaluation firm since 1975, completing revaluations in 30 counties in North <br />Carolina as well as in other states; (3) Designed the software currently <br />being used by COTT Systems; and {4) Currently does fee appraisals in Cabarrus <br />County. Re discussed the importance of adequately training personnel for the <br />revaluation process and stated in his opinion it would be best for the County <br />to hire someone to train its personnel over a two-year period. Mr. Ferriss <br />also recommended that photographs be taken of every house/property in the <br />county during the next revaluation. <br /> <br /> There was discussion concerning the postponement of the 2003 <br />revaluation, including the following: (1) personnel and new technology <br />issues; (2) the rate at which property values are rising and the impact of <br />the economy on property values~ (3) the merits of delaying.the revaluation <br />for one year or two years; and (4) the State's decision to cease <br />reimbursements to the counties effective July 1, 2003. <br /> <br /> UPON ~4OTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Vice Chairman Carruth <br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to delay the 2003 revaluation for at <br />least one year with the Tax Administrator to make a report to the Board <br />concerning issues related to delaying the revaluation. Upon receiving that <br />report, the Board will then determine if the revaluation should occur in 2004 <br />or be delayed until 2005. <br /> <br />EXPO <br /> <br /> Mr. Mark Chappuis, Expo General Manager, gave an update on the Expo <br />Project and presented a s~unmary sheet ~howing initial projections for <br />facility usage. He estimated 109 events {i.e., County Fair, concerts, high <br />school graduations, theater, banquets, horse shows, etc.) during the first <br />calendar year. <br /> <br /> <br />