Laserfiche WebLink
409 <br />o,,__ DRAFT <br />Status Report ~Uniffed Development Ordinance" - David Mavfield, UDO Stserin~ <br />Conunit tea ~hairma~ <br /> <br /> Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning Services Director, introduced Mr. David <br />Mayfield, Chairman of the Unified Development Ordinance (UD0) Steering <br />Committee, for an update on the development of the UD0. <br /> <br /> Chairman Fennel announced that he had invited the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission to meet with the County Commissioners on March 27~h at <br />approximately 7:30 p.m. during the Board's recessed meeting. He stated the <br />purpose of the meeting was to build the Board's relationship with the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission as well as to discuss the development of the <br />UD0. <br /> <br /> Mr. David Mayfield, UDO Steering Committee Chairman, gave an over~iew <br />of the development process for the UDO. He addressed the issue of growth, <br />including the impact of growth and the importance of managing growth. The <br />Steering Committee received the draft UDO in late October and realized at <br />that time the document was too cumbersome. The Committee asked staff to <br />eliminate the unnecessary components of the document and to organize it in a <br />way that it is understandable. A clean draft is expected by the end of May, <br />and the Steering Committee will then go back to community groups and the <br />general public for input. Mr. Mayfield recommended that the Steering <br />Committee be given a longer period of time to review the document with the <br />elected officials to consider adoption in the fall of 2000. <br /> <br /> There was discussion regarding the purpose of the UD0, the process for <br />developing the document, objections by various groups, concerns of the <br />building industry and misconceptions about the draft UD0 that have been <br />created by recent newspaper articles. Mr. Mayfield responded to a number of <br />questions by the Board regarding the review process. Anyone with questions <br />concerning the draft UDO should contact Planning Services for information. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mayfield introduced Dr. Tyrel Moore and Ms. Jo Coble, members of <br />the UDO Steering Committee who were present for the meeting. <br /> <br /> The Board agreed by general consensus for the Steering Committee to <br />proceed with the extended UDO review process with adoption by the governing <br />boards anticipated in the fall Of 2000. <br /> <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br />Bud=et Amendment - Emergency Telephone Fund <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carpenter, seconded by Chairman Fennel and <br />unanimously carried, the Board adopted the following budget amendment. <br /> <br /> BUDGET REVISION/AMENDMENT REQUEST <br />DEPARTMENT OF Finance <br />AMOUNT: $989,500.00 <br />TYPE OF ADJUSTMENT: Supplement Request <br />PURPOSE OF REQUEST: TO increase the Emergency Telephone budget for expected <br /> <br /> Present Approved <br />Account N9. Budqet <br />40062740-6651 1,525,000.00 <br />Telephone Subscriber Fees <br />40062740-6701 35,500.00 <br /> Interest on Investments <br />40092740-9445 1,560,500.00 <br /> Purchased Services <br /> <br />875,000.00 <br />114,500.00 <br />989,500.00 <br /> <br />Decrease <br /> <br /> Revised <br />BudGet <br />2,400,000.00 <br /> <br />150,000.00 <br /> <br />2,550,000.00 <br /> <br />Budqe~ Amendm~ot - Co--unity Development Home 98 Proaram Close Out <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carpenter, seconded by Chairman Fennel and <br />unanimously carried, the Board adopted the following budget amendment. <br /> <br /> BUDGET REVISION/AMENDMENT REQUEST <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF Finance <br />AMOUNT: $133,575.00 <br />TYPE OF ADJUSTMENT: Supplemental Request <br /> <br /> <br />