Laserfiche WebLink
480 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br /> Chairman Fennel opened the public hearing on Petition C00-06(R). The <br />Public Hearing Notice was published in TEE CHarLOTTE OBSERVER (Cabarrus <br />Neighbors) on June ll and June 15, 2000. Since this was a Special Use <br />Rezoning, Mr. Hartsell and the Cierk affirmed those persons who indicated <br />they wished to address the Board during the public hearing~ Prior to <br />addressing the Board, each speaker acknowledged that he/she had been <br />previously sworn or affirmed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning Services Director, presented the staff <br />report concerning Petition C00-06(R). The property located off Highway 24-27 <br />in the Midland area is currently zoned Limited Commercial (LC) along the <br />frontage and Low Density Residential to the rear of the property. The <br />petitioner, David Bigford of Bigford Enterprises, wishes to rezone the <br />property to Limited Commercial (Special Use) for the purpose of developing <br />multi-family housing as well as related commercial uses along NC 24/27. The <br />property consists of approximately 8.65 acres in a currently mixed use area. <br />Sewer service is available to the crossroads area as well as public water <br />service. The developer has proposed to eliminate a number of the uses <br />allowed in a Limited Commercial zone and to limit future uses of the <br />property. The following list of proposed limited uses for the Limited <br />Commercial Special Use rezoning was included in the Agenda package: <br /> <br />FRONT PARCEL - Permitted Uses: Bank/financial institution/ATM; <br />Barber and beauty shops; Car Wash; Dry cleaning/pick up station; <br />Hotels, motels, inns; Laundromat; Office, professional; Parking <br />lot, commercial or private; Pet shop/grooming (enclosed); <br />Photographic Studio; Religious Institution (with a total capacity <br />of 350 or less); Restaurant, excluding drive through; Retail <br />sales-shopping centers 15,000 square,feet and less; Single family <br />residential attached; Trade & Vocational Schools. Permitted <br />based on Standards (PBS): Accessory apartment; Nursery/daycare <br />center; Printing and reprographic facility; Recreational <br />facility, indoor. <br />REAR PARCEL - Permitted Uses: Duplex; Multifamily Residential; <br />Townhouses. <br /> <br />Mr. Marshall advised that the Planning staff recommends approval of the <br />petition, stating it is in keeping with development occurring in that area as <br />well as the Midland Area Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission <br />recommended denial of the petition by a 5 to 4 vote on May 18, 2000. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Privette asked if the property is located within the <br />proposed incorporation area of Midland. Mr. Marshall advised that it is <br />within that area. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jerry Newton, representing Bigford Enterprises, stated the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission voted to deny the petition after discussion concerning <br />the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance and the issue of schools. He asked <br />that the Board focus on the petition. He explained the front portion is <br />currently zoned Limited Commercial which would allow 66 various uses, <br />including up to eight dwelling units per acre for multi-family. According to <br />Mr. Newton, 18 multi-family units per acre were permitted in the Limited <br />Commercial district at the time Mr. Bigford purchased the property. However, <br />a Zoning Text Amendment has reduced that number, thus requiring Mr. Bigford <br />to revise his development plans. Mr. Newton said the request by Bigford <br />Enterprises is to combine the two parcels of prpperty, locate commercial <br />activities on the front parcel, develop an apartment community to the rear <br />and eliminate 34 of the 66 uses allowed in the Limited Commercial district. <br />He stated the proposed development is consistent with the Midland Area Plan <br />adopted in 1997. Mr. Newton submitted letters from Barbee Realty and <br />Carousel Real Estate that he staked gave character references for Mr. Bigford <br />and also addressed the need for apartments and rental units in the general <br />area. He said the rezoning would have no impact on the school and adequate <br />utilities are available. He did advise that Bethel Elementary is not <br />currently capped and school staff indicated that it is not approaching <br />capping. Mr. Newton reviewed Mr. Bigford's experience in building apartments <br />and his existing rental business that includes 36 scattered single family <br />units in Stanly and Cabarrus counties. Finally, Mr. Newton presented a letter <br />signed by Mr. Bigford stating Bigford Enterprises is willing ~to commit to <br />constructing only 24 units per year as a condition of the Special Use <br />Rezoning." This would be two buildings containing not more than 12 units per <br />building, <br /> <br /> Mr. James Martin, President of the Midland Community Association, <br />stated the Association had voted unanimously at its June meeting to request <br />denial of the petition. He said that Ms. Nancy Matheson and Ms. Joyce Beatty <br /> <br /> <br />