AG 2000 10 16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. Table 4.7-1 Impervious surface ratios low on RV, RC, B-l, C-l, O-I, C-2 The impervious surface ratios are a compromise between each of the jurisdictions. Some have lower ratios and others have higher ratios. In the C-l, C-2 and O-I zones the UDO sets the maximum impervious coverage at 70% of the lot area. In the B-1 district, it is set at 65% of the lot area. In the RC and RV zones, it is set at 50%. This represents a 5% to 10% reduction over the County's current impervious coverage limitations. In the industrial zones (I-2 and I-l), the UDO increases the permitted impervious coverage by 10% to 30% over the County's current regulations. 5. Table 4.7-1 Maximum building setbacks should not be ... (Jerry did not finish this sentence). (I think he wanted to say, "should not be set".) Because these developments will likely be in in-fill areas within Concord and Kannapolis, it is felt that the maximum front setback is important to ensure a consistent street appearance in these areas. 6. Table 4.6-1 lerry advocates a review of the proposed use table and suggests several changes. Staff has spent a good deal of time going through the use chart and agrees with Jerry that editional review of the use Chart is needed. Staff is trying to sort through the use charts of five jurisdictions to ensure that there fs as little change as possible between current Lolicy and the UDO. 7. Table 4.6-1 Will each jurisdiction agree to the same table or will the uses be different among the jurisdictions. The overall goal is to have these tables to be the same. More than likely there will be some variation between the jurisdietious. For example in one jurisdiction, a particular use may be permitted by right and in another, it may be a conditional use. 8. 4.2.2 Refers to two overlays that are only for Concord. Are there any such overlays just for Cabarrns County? If so, they are not available on the interact. · Yes, staff recommends that the Thoroughfare Overlay Zone (TOZ) from the County's current zoning ordinance be continued within the UDO. 4.2.4 If there are new zoning dislricts initiated by "any other interested party" can a person who will not be directly affected by such new zoning district apply? This seems very d~ngerous and I would hope that new zoning districts can only be initiated and applied for by the local governing body or directly affected property owner. This paragraph discusses who may request the addition of or amendment to zoning districts within the UDO. Any person should be permitted to request that a new zoning district be added or a zoning district be amended. This paragraph should be amended to delete the discussion of-requesting rezonings. Rezonlng procedures are discussed in Section 3.3. I0. 4.3.8 Establishes maximum density of 6 dua yet Table 4.7-1 states 5 dua. · This should be changed so the purpose statement for the district and Table 4.7-1 match.