Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Cabarrus County is located in the piedmont section of North Carolina, just to the <br />east/northeast of Mecklenburg. The county seat, Concord, is approximately fifteen miles <br />from Charlotte. The population of the county and its two major municipalities has <br />increased by almost 50% in the last two decades, as evidenced in Table 1 below: <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br /> <br />I Cabarrus <br /> <br />!Concord <br /> <br />I Kannapolis** <br /> <br />1980 1990 <br />85,895 98,935 <br /> <br />16,942 ,7,.~47 <br />...... 29,709 <br /> <br />1998' <br /> <br />125,000 <br /> <br />42.43 <br /> <br />35,288 <br /> <br />* 1 / 1/98 estimate bv Cabarrus Regional Chamber of Commerce <br />**Approximately 25% of the population of Kannapolis resides in Rowan County and <br />75% in Cabarrus County. <br /> <br />Obviously, this rapid population increase will effect the types and amount of criminal <br />iustice services needed in Cabarrus and surrounding counties. <br /> <br />The Cabarms County Criminal Justice Advisory Board held its first meeting on Mav 15. <br />1998 and has met six times. The board has reviewed Structured Sentencing, including <br />the work of the Sentencing Commission and the philosophy and values which form the <br />foundation of the sentencing plan. The board understands that the Sentencing <br />Commission decided it must make choices regarding the use of costly prison space, and <br />that the choices the Commission made mean that violent and repeat offenders serve a <br />longer time incarcerated, while more offenders convicted of property crimes and with <br />fewer prior convictions may be placed on probation and in various communitv <br />corrections programs. The Advisory Board has studied the sentencing grid several times, <br />concentrating on those cells where offenders can receive intermediate punishment. <br />Finally, the Advisory Board understands that judicial decisions regarding those offenders <br />~vho fall in UA cells are the most critical in terms of effecting the prison population. <br /> <br />The Advisory Board does not have any plans to do cell-by-cell decision- making at the <br />present time. It is believed that available funds are adequate to provide substance abuse <br />services, the program agreed upon by the board, to all eligible offenders who need it. <br />However, the board will monitor the substance abuse treatment program being <br />implemented to assess its impact on I and I/A cells on the sentencing grid. <br /> <br />At its first meeting, the board reviewed the purpose of the Criminal Justice Partnership <br />Program and the purpose/mission of the Advisory Board. A committee was established <br />to determine data the board would need to make program decisions. Since a decision was <br />made early on not to establish a pretrial program, jail data was not collected. Probation <br />data is now available from Research and Planning in the Department of Correction, so no <br />probation sample was necessary. Interns in the Division of Community Corrections <br />collected information on community resources available to offenders. <br /> <br /> <br />