AG 1999 01 19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Administration of Justice Bulletin No. 98/03 December 1998 disclosed only to Nor~ Carolina judges for the par- pose of ascertaining whether a person charged with an offense has been granted an expunction, After a persen's juvenile record is expunged, that person and his or her parent may not be found guilty of perjury or of giving a false statement for failing to acknowledge the record. Disclosure of Information about Juveniles Information Sharing among Agencies New G.S. 7B-3100 directs the Office of Juvenile Justice, after consultation with the Conference of Chief District Court Judges, to adopt rules designating local agencies that are authorized to share information rele- vant to any case in which a petition has been filed alleging thai a juvenile is undisciplined, delinquent, abused, neglected, or dependent. Former GS. 7A- 675(h). much of which is retained in the new section, applied only to abuse, neglect, and dependency cases, and dixected the chief district court judge in each dis- trict to designate the agencies by administrative order. Information that agencies share pursuant to the section may be used only for the protection of the juvenile and others or to improve the educational opportunities of the juvenile, Disclosure by or to Schools Information that is shared by schools pursuant to GS. 7B-3100. described above, must be released in accordance wSth the federal Family Educational Pdghts and Privacy Act. An amendment to GS. 115C-404(b) prohibits a school's use of information gamed pursuant to GS. 7B-3100 as the sole basis for a decision to sus- pend or expel a student. The new code, in G.S. 7B- 3101. continues the requirement that court counselors notify, schools of certain occurrences in cases of juve- niles alleged or found to be delinquent for felony offenses. Amendments to G.S. 115C-404(a) specify when a school must destroy information it obtains un- der either G.S. 7B-3100 or G.S. 7B-3101. Studies and Other Agency Directives In addition to statutory, duties described earlier, S.L. 1998-202 (or, where specified, S.L. 1998-212) imposes a number of specific responsibilities on state agencies and departments. Training on New Juvenile Code Training on the provisions of the new luvenile Code must be provided by July t., 1.999, as follows. · The Office nf Juvenile Justice (OJJ) must provide training for juvenile court counselors and other OJJ personnel. · The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) must provide training for court per- sonnel, including judges and district attor- neys. The AOC may contract with qualifiod educational institutions to provide the training. · The Department of Justice must provide training for'law enforcement perse nnel throughout the state. Minority Sensitivity Training The Office of Juvenile Justice (OS J) must ensure that all juvenile court counselors and other OJJ per- sonnel receive minority sensitivity training and must conduct the training annually. The training must be in effect by May 1., 1999, and the OJJ may contract with qualified educational institutions to provide the training. The Department of Justice must develop guide- lines for minority sensitivity training for all law enforcement personnel throughout the state and, except where local law enforcement already' has training that satisfies the gmdelines, conduct the training annually~ The guidelines and training must be in effect by May I, 1999. In addition, both the OJJ and the Department of Justice must ensure that all personnel who work with minority juveniles in the juvenile justice system are taught to communicate effectively with nunority juve- niles and to recognize and address their needs. S.L. 1998-202 requires the Chief Justice of the state Supreme Court to consider ensuring that all judges who hear juvenile cases receive minority sensi- tivity training. Assessment of Treatment of Minority Juveniles The Office of Juvenile Justice (O J J) must study the overrepresentation of racial minorities in the juve- nile justice gstem: compare the dispositions for mi- nority juveniles adjudicated delinquent or undisci- plined with the dispositions for nonminority juveniles: compare the services made available to minority and nonminority juveniles and theft families; and make recommendations as to how any disparities should be 24