Laserfiche WebLink
ICASARRUS COUN~] <br /> ioRr~ CAROLIIA <br /> <br />· Agenda 6/21/99 · <br /> <br />To: Board of Commissioners <br /> <br />Re: School Construction Funding Options <br /> <br />At the May 17th Board meeting, staff was directed to formulate options related to the financing of <br />two more schools (a new middle and new elementary school). Cost estimates for the projects <br />exceed $30 million. Specific sites remain to be identified. <br /> <br />In June 1999, we will complete the sale of $30 million of new debt for the high school. The debt <br />service for that project is in the FY 2000 budget at an estimated cost of $2.7 million/year. <br /> <br />The N. C. Local Government Commission has advised that it would consider authorizing the <br />County to do another $30 million financing for the two new schools as was done for the high <br />school. Doing so avoids the requirement for a local bond referendum, if the County Commission <br />authorizes the new debt. Based on current assessment valuation, $2.7 million annual debt <br />service represents three cents (3¢) on the County tax rate. <br /> <br />Timino~ <br /> <br />The County has an (AA--) rating with the three bond rating agencies (Fitch, Moody's and S&P). <br />During rating presentations, staff detailed the potential for another $30 million in school projects. <br />It is likely that the added debt would not adversely impact the County's bond rating if properly <br />timed. New developments (Mills, Coming and others) should produce increases in real property <br />valuations and gross revenue streams significant enough to moderate the impact of the added <br />debt burden on financial ratios important to the bond rating agencies. The "trends" in these <br />ratios will be better established in FY 2001. <br /> <br />It is suggested that the "timing" of the sale of added debt ($30 million) be scheduled to occur in <br />July 2000 (FY 2001). That will provide one year's spacing between debt issuances. That does <br />not mean that the two school projects must wait until the spring of 2000 to begin. Some aspects <br />of one or both projects may proceed (land acquisition, architectural and engineering work). <br />However, issuance of construction contracts should be timed to coincide with assumption of new <br />debt. <br /> <br />Financin~ O~tions <br /> <br />The annual debt payment associated with the added $30 million debt for the two new schools <br />should approximate $2.7 million/year or three cents (3¢) on the current FY 2000 assessed <br />valuation. If debt is sold before July 2000, a full year's debt service could be expected in FY <br />2001. <br /> <br />Office of the County Manager <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />