Laserfiche WebLink
485 <br /> <br />capacity by 2005; Odell Hlementar~ is currently at capacity and is anticipated <br />to be 42 percent over capacity in 2005. <br /> <br /> ~r. Ralph Bonds, petitioner and owner of 56 acres in the proposed business <br />park, spoke in support of the rezoning. He stated the property is not suitable <br />for housing due to the location of the airport and Vulcan Materials. <br /> <br /> ~[r. Hoyle Holland, petitioner and property owner on Derita Road, supported <br />the rezoning. He stated the location of 1-85, the airport, Vulcan Materials and <br />other industrial uses have changed the desirability of this land for agriculture <br />or residential use. According to Mr. Holland, the proposed park will have little <br />impact on neighboring properties. <br /> <br /> Mr. Glen Hardymon, attorney with Kensedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman and <br />representing the trust administered by First Union National Bank, spoke in <br />support of the rezoning. He stated the trust property is located in the center <br />of the area requested for rezoning and does not abut directly to the subdivision. <br />According to Mr. Hardymon, the land is no longer suitable for residential <br />develop~nt and rezoning request by the multiple property owners is in the best <br />interest of the County. <br /> <br /> )tr. Hartsell questioned the conditions that are proposed for the developoent <br />in addition to the restriction of uses as identified. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hardymon stated the conditions were outlined in a letter dated January <br />15, 1998 and were included on the concept plan as presented by Mr. Alex Rankin <br />on this date. These conditions included the grandfathering of curb cuts on <br />driveways on the existing residential property, a vesting of specific residential <br />parcels, one curb cut for tracts with 50 acres or less, two curb outs for tracts <br />with 50 to 150 acres, three curb cuts for tracts over 150 acres, the reservation <br />of 50 feet from the center line of Derita Road and where applicable Poplar Tent <br />Road; and buffers as indicated on the map. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hard~on and Mr. Hankin reiterated that the conditions set forth in Mr. <br />Hardymon's letter were represented on the concept plan currently before the <br />board. <br /> <br /> Chairman Casper asked all petitioners and persons representing petitioners <br />to stand. It was determined that all petitioners were present except Jennifer <br />Rene Motley who owns one of the residential parcels for vesting purposes. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hartsell presented the following question to the petitioners: Do you and <br />each of you agree that those are the conditions as outlined on this coscept plan <br />and as you previously identified the restriction of uses that you agree to with <br />regard to this rezoning matter before the Board this evening? Ail petitioners <br />answered in the affirmative. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hartsell affirmed Mr. Clifford Hurndon and Ms. Jennie Bridges. <br /> <br /> Mr. clifford Hurndon discussed the need for development as well as the need <br />to protect current residents. Ne confirmed that the western part of the property <br />is not suitable for residential development but stressed the need to plan an <br />additional buffer zone to protect the residents of Beech Bluff. <br /> <br /> Mr. Henry Norton of Beech Bluff spoke in support of a transitional area <br />between the industrial park and the subdivision. <br /> <br /> Mr. Buren Efird of 840 Derita Road and a petitioner supported approval of <br />the rezoning. Me stated he is satisfied with the required buffer zones and <br />stated his home will be surrounded on three sides by the developoent. <br /> <br /> Ms. Jennie Bridges of Twin Creeks Subdivision complained that residents of <br />her subdivision did not know about the proposed rezoning. Stating it was unfair <br />for those residents to have the airport in their backyard as well as the pro~eed <br />industrial park, she asked the County to give those residents the replacement <br />values for their homes so they may live elsewhere. <br /> <br /> There was no one else who wished to address the Board and Chairman Casper <br />closed the public hearing at 10:10 P.M. <br /> <br /> Mr. clifton raised the following issues for the Board's consideration: <br />existing buffer requirements, transitory zones, dedication of right of ways, <br />purpose of the Poplar Tent Beautification District, and trans~rtation and road <br />improvements. <br /> <br /> <br />