My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1998 05 18
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1998
>
AG 1998 05 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:06:15 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:51:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
5/18/1998
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STUDY METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />Municipal Advisors Incorporated used the following methodology in reviewing and <br />updating the Cabarrus County classification system and pay plan. <br /> <br />The consultants met with the County Manager and Director of Human Resources <br />to establish working relationships, review current approaches and policies, collect <br />ali available data indicating programs and materials currently in use and to identify <br />the strengths and weaknesses in the existing systems. <br /> <br />A group meeting was held with all department heads to explain the purpose of the <br />study, the steps MAI would follow in conducting the study, the time schedule and <br />types of assistance that would be required. In addition, individual meetings were <br />conducted with department heads to collect data concerning organizational <br />arrangements, operations, programs and staffing and specific departmental needs <br />and concerns were identified. <br /> <br />A series of employee briefing sessions were conducted by the consultant to explain <br />the study process and answer questions for employees. <br /> <br />Position Analysis Questionnaires (PAQ) and instruction sheets were distributed to <br />all employees. They were asked to describe their job duties and responsibilities in <br />detail. These descriptions were reviewed by each employee's supervisor and <br />department head for verification of completeness, accuracy and any supervisory <br />comment necessary or desirable. <br /> <br />Upon receipt of the completed position analysis questionnaires, each was <br />individually reviewed and: preliminary classification decisions were made. At this <br />preliminary stage, any apparent discrepancies, conflicts or omissions were noted <br />and the consultant returned to Concord for interviews and job audits with specific <br />employees to expand or clarify available information. Seventy-five (75) job audits <br />were conducted. <br /> <br />Following information gathering, analysis, verification and discussion, new Class <br />Descriptions were developed and each employee was assigned to a proposed class. <br />The preliminary Class Descriptions and class assignments were submitted to the <br />County for review and comment by the employees, department heads and <br />supervisors. <br /> <br />Simultaneously, the consultant solicited salary information from nine (9) local <br />public agencies and eight (8) counties across North Carolina of similar size and <br />make-up as Cabarrus County that could affect the recruitment and retention of <br />employees. Additionally, salary data was solicited from the Employment Security <br />Commission (ESC) and several local employers. Salary data was solicited for sixty <br />(60) benchmark positions including clerical, techgi,'cal, public safety, professional <br />and managerial positions. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.