My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1998 07 13
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1998
>
AG 1998 07 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:07:15 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:52:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
7/13/1998
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Having made such substantial investments and carried out the prior phases of' its <br /> development, in reliance upon the approved PUD, it would be inequitable for the Board now to <br /> prohibit the petitioner fi-om completing that development as approved. <br /> <br /> 4. The Board may not shift the burden of' its constitutional responsibility to provide <br /> <br /> educational Facilities to the petitioner and other private property owners in this manner. The <br /> North Carolina Constitution provides that "the People have a right to the privilege of' education, <br /> and it is the duty of the State to guard and maintain that right." Art. 1, Sec. 15. It fiarther <br /> provides that: "...the General Assembly may assign to units of' local government . . . <br /> responsibility For the financial support of'the free public schools as it may deem appropriate..." <br /> The General Assembly has delegated the responsibility to provide school facilities to the <br /> <br />counties. N.C. Gen. Stat. {} 115C-408 states that "it is the policy of'the State... that the facility <br /> .. <br />requirements For a public education system will be met by County government." <br /> <br /> By implication, denial of' the petitioner's plat on grounds that the County does not have <br />adequate schools shifts the burden of. this responsibility to the petitioner and other private <br />property owners. As a consequence, such property owners must either itssume that responsibility <br />themselves or be deprived of' use and enjoyment of their property without compensation in <br />violation of the "takings" clause. That is not constitutionally permissible, and there is no <br />statutory authority given to the County to make such an impositio~ as discussed above. <br /> <br /> 5. The denial of' this petition would violate the "equal protection" clau~e of' the <br /> <br />Constitution,. The 14t~ Amendment of'the U.S. Constitution also provides that it is unlawful for <br />States (and their subdivision) to deprive citizens of. "equal protection"' under the law. Upon <br />information and belief, the County has already approved some developments notwithstanding a <br />shortage of school Facilities, and application of' the new "adequate public Facilities" ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.