My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1998 08 17
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1998
>
AG 1998 08 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2002 7:32:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:52:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
8/17/1998
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
..J'Ult t5 °94 t6-'37 PRRkER POE ADZe'IS ':9.%9 8,-"8 0564 <br /> <br />P. 10 <br /> <br /> approximately 20% of the steam plant and also included <br /> $5,019,591 in capitalized Interest. The County ~oard properly <br /> included all I]VAC in the real property value. <br /> <br /> 3. The coal-fired boiler system employed by the Taxpayer is the <br /> most efficient and economical type of boiler system for an <br /> installation as large as that under consideration. The <br /> Comission rejects the Taxpayer's contention that the coal- <br /> fired system is obsolete. <br /> <br /> 4. The useful life of fifteen (15) years assigned to cigarette <br /> manufacturing equipment as recommended by the Department of <br /> Revenue trending tables is consistent with the actual lives of <br /> the Taxpayer's manufacturing equipment. <br /> <br />5. The personal proi~erty is oruly affected by normal obsolescence, <br /> which is accounted for through the application of the <br /> Department of Revenue trending tables for the business personal . <br /> property at issue. No further reduction in value for <br /> obsolescence is warranted. <br /> <br />6. With regard to the County's currency adjustment calculation, <br /> the County failed to carry the burden of establishing a value <br /> higher than the County Board assigned to the personal property. <br /> <br />7. The County BOard included some capitalized interest as an <br /> element of the appraised values. The Taxpayer failed to <br /> prove that said portion of capitalized interest should not have' <br /> been include~; ~ere£ore those values, inclu~ing capitalized <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.