My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1998 10 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1998
>
AG 1998 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:08:56 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:52:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/19/1998
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Having made such substantial investments and carried out the prior phases of its <br /> development, in reliance upon the approved PUD, it would be inequitable for the Board now to <br /> prohibit the petitioner from completing that development as approved. <br /> <br /> 4. The Board may not shift the burden of its constitutional responsibility to provide <br /> <br />educational facilities to the petitioner and other private property owners in this manner. The <br />North Carolina Constitution provides that "the People have a right to the privilege of education, <br />and it is the duty of the State to guard and maintain that right." Art. 1, Sec. 15. It further <br />provides that: "...the General Assembly may assign to units of local government .... <br /> <br />responsibility for the financial support of the free public schools as it may deem appropriate..." <br />The General Assembly has delegated the responsibility to provide school facilities to the <br />counties. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-408 states that "it is the policy of the State... that the facility <br />requirements for a public education system will be met by County government." <br /> <br /> By implication, denial of the petitioner's plat on grounds that the County does not have <br />adequate schools shifts the burden of this responsibility to the petitioner and other private <br />property owners. As a consequence, such property owners must either assume that responsibility <br />themselves or be deprived of use and enjoyment of their property without compensation in <br />violation of the "takings" clause. That is not constitutionally permissible, and there is no <br />statutory authority given to the County to make such an imposition, as discussed above. <br /> <br /> 5. The denial of this petition would violate the "equal protection" clause of the <br /> <br />Constitution. The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution also provides that it is unlawful for <br />States (and their subdivision) to deprive citizens of "equal protection" under the law. Upon <br />information and belief, the County has already approved some developments notwithstanding a <br />shortage of school facilities, and application of the new "adequate public facilities" ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.