My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1998 12 21
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1998
>
AG 1998 12 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:10:11 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:53:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/21/1998
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
state-generated revenues. New.. taxing authority for counties should not be viewed as a catalyst for <br />shifting costs from the state to counties. This avoids undue burden on counties and provides for <br />even funding of mandated programs across the state. <br /> <br />tO mc~.t .......... ,.l .......... ts ............................. o,a, ............... : <br /> .._:~.,, g~.aFh- .~:~,~,.,,,;^. ^r ,,. .............. '~^'"'~ "~ c~ .........a.t .... <br /> <br /> .............................. ., ......... '~ <br /> <br />redistribution of new tax sources should be implemented without taking into account taxpayer <br />equity as reflected by local needs, local fundihg efforts, and local funding capability. <br />There may be ch-cumstances in which broad statewide policy objectives necessitate reductions in <br />the tax bases of local governments. In such cases, the General Assembly should provide counties <br />and cities with reimbursements from state sources which replace the actual loss in each county on a <br />dollar-for-dollar basis. <br />Any a~t[2nal t-~ revenue authority for counties should be employed to produce unrestricted <br />revenue under the control of county commissioners and municipal officials. Local government tax <br />revenues should not be earmarked for specific programs, functions, or services. <br />Optional tax sources should be evaluated by state and local officials in terms of their impact on <br />various ~oups of taxpayers, taking into consideration ability to pay, wealth, and benefit in order to <br />avoid overburdening any particular group of taxpayers. <br /> <br />Fiscal Integrity of Counties <br /> <br />The continued fiscal health of county government depends upon: <br /> <br />State laws and guidance which provide for sound financial management practices that are adaptable <br />to the special needs of each county. <br />Guidance from appropriate state agencies on necessary improvements in consistent accounting, <br />reporting and auditing procedures. <br />Recognition by state agencies which oversee programs operated by county governments that there <br />have been significant improvements in budgeting and fiscal management practices at the county <br />levels and elimination of pressure from state agencies on counties to carry out practices which are <br />redundant, duplicative, or inconsistent with generally accepted principles of budgeting and <br />accounting. <br />Timely information from the Legislative and Executive Branches of state government regarding <br />budgetary decisions which affect taxation, budgeting, and fiscal management by counties. In order <br />to enhance the fiscal integrity of counties, the Association of County Commissioners will continue <br />to support improvements in financial management practices and reduction of inconsistencies in <br />fiscal procedures among programs administered by county governments. <br /> <br />Financing Public Facilities <br /> <br />County governments have the primary responsibility for financing a range of public facilities which include: <br />public schools, local jails, court buildings and county administrative buildings. Historically, counties have <br />utilized the public bond market as the main source of long-term f'mancing for such facilities. Recent changes <br />in Federal tax laws which will affect the municipal bond market, along with the use of new facilities <br />financing techniques in other states, necessitate consideration of broader financing authority for counties. <br /> <br />Accordingly, the Association will work with the Local Government Comsnission to find suitable alternative <br />means of financing necessary public facilities. The Association believes that revisions in the traditional <br />approach to long-term financing of public facilities should offer financially feasible ways of providing ' <br />multi-year financing of capital projects without jeopardizing fiscal well-being of county governments. <br /> <br />I.Jshas~d/¢d/Policy Statcmcnt on T~ation and Finance Proposed Changes /_~ ~// (~) <br /> <br />As of 9~94 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.