Laserfiche WebLink
substantial expenditure also vest development rights. A review of both statutory <br />and common law vested rights may be found in David Owens book Legislative <br />Zoning Decisions: Legal Aspects (Inst. of Government, 1993) a copy of which is <br />available in the Planning Services offices. <br /> <br />N.C. COUNTIES AND TOWNS THAT HAVE USED MORATORIA <br /> <br />RECENTLY <br /> <br />· Town of Davidson <br />The town enacted a moratorium on new subdivision approvals and rezonings <br />for one year, from 10/11/94 to 10/11/95, to give them time to complete a new <br />land use plan. They wanted to ensure that any new projects would fit in with <br />their new plan. They did not experience any opposition to this moratorium. <br /> <br />· Town of FIuntersville <br />Huntersville's moratorium was similar to Davidson's. The town wanted to write <br />a new zoning ordinance that incorporated more compact and neighborhood- <br />oriented development and wanted to stop the commitment of any new land to <br />suburban-type development in the meantime. Their moratorium was on new <br />subdivision approvals and rezonings and ran for one year, from 11/14/95 to <br />11/14/96. <br /> <br />· Union County <br />The wastewater treatment plan that served northern Union County reached a <br />capacity in late 1993 and the county reacted by placing a moratorium on <br />proposed housing which planned to rely on public wastewater treatment <br />facilities in the specific geographic area served by this wastewater treatment <br />plant. They continued to issue permits for residential development that used <br />septic systems or found alternative ways to treat the wastewater. The <br />moratorium lasted from early 1994 to early 1995. During this time the county <br />increased the capacity of its facilities. <br /> <br />· Rowan County <br />Rowan County is currently in the process of developing a county-wide zoning <br />ordinance. Until they adopt this ordinance, they only have land use authority <br />over the defined watersheds in the county. In the fall of 1994, they were in the <br />process of writing new subdivision regulations and also found out that a <br />developer was building a subdivision with roads that were illegal and not built <br />to state standards. They enacted a moratorium on subdivision development in <br />the watersheds for one month (from 9/94 to 10/94) to give them time to pass the <br />new subdivision regulations. <br /> <br /> <br />