My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1997 05 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1997
>
AG 1997 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:28:31 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
5/19/1997
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />Page 3 <br />May 13, 1997 <br /> <br />A mediating step could be to establish a building permit allocation system (building <br />permit caps). It would follow a similar process to the "APFO" but be tied to school <br />building projects funded by other sources. <br /> <br />Them would be an impact on commercial development and negative publicity could <br />impede industrial development. <br /> <br />B. Outcomes <br /> <br />An extended moratorium with or without building caps would probably impact <br />lower cost housing the most, basically pushing housing costs up on existing housing <br />units and limiting most new housing to high end units. <br /> <br />Control of the number of new housing units into the system could reduce the <br />number of new school students but without new revenues, school construction <br />would still fall to the property tax rate. <br /> <br />Summary_: <br /> <br />The Alternative Revenue Task Force's recommendations were the best solution. Implementation of <br />the "APFO" with or without a residential construction moratorium will be litigated and time <br />consuming. The implementation ofany"APFO" fee structure will be seen as abusive by the building <br />industry, applicable only to new construction and litigated. <br /> <br />Ii'we pursue the "APFO," hopefully we would always extend the option that if given the opportunity <br />to have a local option sales tax and/or land transfer tax, the "APFO" could be modified or repealed. <br />This might give the building industry an incentive to work toward the implementation of the sales <br />tax/transfer tax options. <br /> <br />This memorandum is provided for reference purposes only. Jonathan Marshall's submittal will be <br />more detailed and factual. <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> '~ Jr. <br />County Mahlager <br /> <br />FWC/sb <br />Attachments <br />cc: Fletcher Hartsell <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.