Laserfiche WebLink
377 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br /> The Board may submit to a vote of the people of the County any <br />resolution or ordinance passed by the Board or any other questlon of <br />public interest, if the Board resolves to do so by a vote of three- <br />fifths (3/5) of its total members. <br /> <br />Section 6. Procedure upon Call of Referendum and Effect of <br />Referendum Result <br /> If a referendum is called pursuant to this Ordinance, the <br />Cabarrus County Board of Elections shall cause the resolution, <br />ordinance or other question of public interest to be voted on to be <br />published in accordance with G.S. 163-33. If a referendum is called <br />under this Ordinance and a majority of the qualified voters voting <br />vote in favor of the measure proposed, then the vote of the people <br />shall be binding upon the Board of Commissioners and the County, and <br />the measure shall become effective throughout the County on the date <br />the results are certified unless the measure contains another <br />effective date. <br /> <br />Section 7. Severabllity. <br /> If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or <br />portion of S.L. 1997-452, this Ordinance, or any measure adopted <br />pursuant to the procedures set forth herein is, for any reason, held <br />to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any Court <br />of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the <br />validity of the remaining portion of S.L. 1997-452, this Ordinance, <br />or any measure duly adopted thereby. The Board declares that it <br />would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, <br />sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, and any measure <br />implemented thereby, despite the fact that any one or more sections, <br />subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this <br />Ordinance or any measure implemented thereby would be declared <br />invalid or unconstitutional. <br /> <br />Adopted this the 15th day of September, 1997. <br /> <br /> /s/ Sue Casper <br /> Sue Casper, Chair <br /> Cabarrus County Board of Colr~ntssioners <br />ATTEST: <br /> /s/ Frankie F. Bonds <br />Frankie F. Bonds, Clerk to the Board <br /> <br />Zoning Atlas Amendment {Petition 97-12 Relative to Rez~nln8 3~181 Acres in <br />Northwest Cabarrus County~ - Public Hearin~ - 7:00 P.M. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning Services Director, presented Petition 97-12 <br />to rezone 3,181 acres in Northwest Cabarrus County from Agricultural-Open to Low <br />Density Residential. The purpose of the rezoning was to recognize changing goals <br />and needs of the county. The petition was sponsored by staff in response to <br />concerns by residents of the northwest area. Mr. Marshall reviewed the location <br />of the area and the impact of the requested rezoning. Single wide mobile homes <br />will no longer be permitted; however, individual farms and farming activities <br />will remain exempt from zoning restrictions. The zoning change itself is not <br />expected to affect property values. <br /> <br /> Chairman Casper opened the public hearing at 7:02 P.M. and asked if anyone <br />wished to speak either for or against the rezoning request. <br /> <br /> Ms. Gray Handwerk~ Field Services Coordinator with the North Carolina <br />Manufactured Mousing Institute, opposed the rezoning. She stated it will place <br />an unfair burden on many potential homeowners, particularly those citizens of low <br />or moderate income. Ms. Handwerk reported that manufactured homes do not have a <br />negative impact on the appreciation of nearby site built homes and submitted for <br />the record a copy of "The Impact of Manufactured Housing on Adjacent Site-Built <br />Residential Properties in North Carolina" by Guoquiang Shen and Richard A. <br />Stephenson of East Carolina University. <br /> <br /> Ms. Kathie Brantley of Archer Road spoke in support of the rezoning. She <br />stated the increasing number of mobile homes in the area has caused concerns <br />about decreased property values, the stability of the neighborhood, increased <br />pressure on crowded schools and increased expenses for fire, police and social <br />services. <br /> <br /> <br />